Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Sutton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Sutton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Sutton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Sutton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Sutton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Sutton. The network helps show where John R. Sutton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Sutton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Sutton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Sutton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Sutton. John R. Sutton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sutton, John R. & Evelyn Tribble. (2014). The Creation of Space: narrative strategies, group agency, and skill in Lloyd Jones’s The Book of Fame. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 52(1). 113–5.2 indexed citations
2.
Sutton, John R.. (2012). Competing in Capabilities: The Globalization Process. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).41 indexed citations
3.
Sutton, John R. & Frank Dobbin. (2009). The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University).244 indexed citations
4.
Dobbin, Frank & John R. Sutton. (1998). The Strength of a Weak State: The Employment Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Division. American Journal of Sociology. 104(2).22 indexed citations
Sutton, John R., Geoff Coates, & C. Stuart Houston. (1992). Hypoxia and mountain medicine : proceedings of the 7th International Hypoxia Symposium held at Lake Louise, Canada, February 1991. Pergamon Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
Binmore, Ken, Avner Shaked, & John R. Sutton. (1988). A Further Test of Noncooperative Bargaining Theory: Reply. American Economic Review. 78(4). 837–839.4 indexed citations
Sutton, John R., C. Stuart Houston, & Norman L. Jones. (1983). Hypoxia, exercise, and altitude : proceedings of the Third Banff International Hypoxia Symposium : Banff, Alberta, Canada, January 25-28, 1983.1 indexed citations
Sutton, John R.. (1981). Drugs used in metabolic disorders. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 13(4). 266???271–266???271.1 indexed citations
19.
Sutton, John R.. (1980). Training and Sponsorship: The Central Issue concerning National Manpower Legislation.. 2(3).
20.
Sutton, John R.. (1978). Hormonal and metabolic responses to exercise in subject of high and low work capacities.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 10(1). 1–6.30 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.