John R. Sladek
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- David M. YurekD. Eugene RedmondR. H. RothKathy Steece‐CollierJane R. TaylorCelia D. SladekTimothy CollierJ. D. Elsworth
- Topics
- Nerve injury and regeneration (8 papers)Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John R. Sladek
15 papers receiving 618 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 379
- Neurology 252
- Molecular Biology 175
- Developmental Neuroscience 137
- Cognitive Neuroscience 106
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Sladek
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Sladek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Sladek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Sladek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Sladek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Sladek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Sladek. The network helps show where John R. Sladek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Sladek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Sladek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Sladek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Sladek. John R. Sladek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grafts of Dopamine Neurons Can Send Neurites to the Striatum Under GDNF Inducement in a Nonhuman Primate | 2 |
| 2 | 64 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | The effect of embryonic nigral grafts on striatal dopamine receptors in unilaterally lesioned rats following chronic l dopa treatment | 1 |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 112 | |
| 10 | 87 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 109 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 12 |
About John R. Sladek
John R. Sladek is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (8 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (137 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (379 citations) and Neurology (252 citations). John R. Sladek has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David M. Yurek, D. Eugene Redmond, R. H. Roth, Kathy Steece‐Collier, Jane R. Taylor, Celia D. Sladek, Timothy Collier, J. D. Elsworth, John D. Elsworth and J.D. Elsworth. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Annual Review of Neuroscience and Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.