John R. Pannell

8.8k total citations
160 papers, 6.1k citations indexed

About

John R. Pannell is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John R. Pannell has authored 160 papers receiving a total of 6.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 137 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 79 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 68 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in John R. Pannell's work include Plant and animal studies (135 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (79 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (51 papers). John R. Pannell is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (135 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (79 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (51 papers). John R. Pannell collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and France. John R. Pannell's co-authors include Brian Charlesworth, Spencer C. H. Barrett, Benoît Pujol, Richard J. A. Buggs, Darren J. Obbard, Marcel E. Dorken, Julia Sánchez Vilas, Stephen A. Harris, Sarah M. Eppley and Elze Hesse and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

John R. Pannell

157 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John R. Pannell Switzerland 46 4.0k 2.5k 2.4k 2.2k 1.9k 160 6.1k
John H. Willis United States 42 3.0k 0.7× 3.1k 1.3× 4.2k 1.7× 1.1k 0.5× 2.3k 1.2× 62 7.5k
Lynda F. Delph United States 52 5.3k 1.3× 3.2k 1.3× 2.0k 0.8× 3.0k 1.4× 2.3k 1.2× 133 7.1k
Kermit Ritland Canada 37 2.5k 0.6× 2.3k 0.9× 3.3k 1.4× 1.7k 0.8× 2.0k 1.0× 82 6.9k
John D. Nason United States 36 3.5k 0.9× 2.5k 1.0× 3.3k 1.4× 1.9k 0.9× 1.1k 0.6× 84 6.4k
Christian Lexer Switzerland 49 3.6k 0.9× 3.1k 1.3× 4.4k 1.8× 1.6k 0.8× 2.3k 1.2× 126 8.3k
Daniel J. Schoen Canada 46 5.5k 1.4× 4.1k 1.7× 2.9k 1.2× 2.8k 1.3× 2.6k 1.4× 126 8.4k
Jana C. Vamosi Canada 32 3.7k 0.9× 2.3k 0.9× 1.6k 0.6× 2.3k 1.1× 1.1k 0.6× 72 5.3k
John R. Stinchcombe Canada 44 3.1k 0.8× 2.9k 1.2× 2.4k 1.0× 1.6k 0.8× 1.4k 0.7× 127 6.8k
Bengt Oxelman Sweden 42 4.2k 1.1× 2.5k 1.0× 1.8k 0.7× 696 0.3× 3.3k 1.8× 109 6.9k
David Baum United States 44 4.1k 1.0× 2.3k 0.9× 1.4k 0.6× 1.1k 0.5× 3.2k 1.7× 133 7.2k

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Pannell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Pannell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Pannell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Pannell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Pannell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Pannell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Pannell. The network helps show where John R. Pannell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Pannell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Pannell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Pannell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Pannell. John R. Pannell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pannell, John R., et al.. (2025). Dioecy in a wind‐pollinated herb explained by disruptive selection on sex allocation via inbreeding avoidance. New Phytologist. 247(6). 2733–2745.
2.
Bilde, Trine, et al.. (2025). Perspectives on mating–system evolution: comparing concepts in plants and animals. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 38(6). 673–692.
3.
Pannell, John R., et al.. (2024). An explanation for the prevalence of XY over ZW sex determination in species derived from hermaphroditism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(40). e2406305121–e2406305121. 5 indexed citations
4.
Pannell, John R., et al.. (2024). Ignoring within‐flower self‐fertilization and inbreeding depression biases estimates of selection on floral traits in a perennial alpine herb. Journal of Ecology. 112(11). 2540–2551. 3 indexed citations
6.
Pannell, John R., et al.. (2024). The joint evolution of separate sexes and sexual dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 38(7). 903–919. 3 indexed citations
7.
Arista, Montserrat, María Talavera, Leonor Patrícia Cerdeira Morellato, et al.. (2023). Multiple pre‐ and postzygotic components of reproductive isolation between two co‐occurring Lysimachia species. New Phytologist. 238(2). 874–887. 12 indexed citations
8.
Tonnabel, Jeanne, Pascal Cosette, Arnaud Lehner, et al.. (2022). Rapid evolution of pollen and pistil traits as a response to sexual selection in the post-pollination phase of mating. Current Biology. 32(20). 4465–4472.e6. 6 indexed citations
9.
Veltsos, Paris, et al.. (2022). Recurrent allopolyploidization, Y-chromosome introgression and the evolution of sexual systems in the plant genus Mercurialis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 377(1850). 20210224–20210224. 9 indexed citations
10.
Villamil, Nora, et al.. (2021). Simulated herbivory enhances leaky sex expression in the dioecious herb Mercurialis annua. Annals of Botany. 129(1). 79–86. 2 indexed citations
11.
Encinas‐Viso, Francisco, Andrew G. Young, & John R. Pannell. (2020). The loss of self‐incompatibility in a range expansion. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 33(9). 1235–1244. 14 indexed citations
12.
Cossard, Guillaume & John R. Pannell. (2020). Enhanced leaky sex expression in response to pollen limitation in the dioecious plant Mercurialis annua. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 34(2). 416–422. 17 indexed citations
13.
Veltsos, Paris, et al.. (2019). YY males of the dioecious plant Mercurialis annua are fully viable but produce largely infertile pollen. New Phytologist. 224(3). 1394–1404. 5 indexed citations
14.
Veltsos, Paris, Kate Ridout, Melissa A. Toups, et al.. (2019). Early Sex-Chromosome Evolution in the Diploid Dioecious Plant Mercurialis annua. Genetics. 212(3). 815–835. 47 indexed citations
15.
Arista, Montserrat, et al.. (2019). Heritabilities of lateral and vertical herkogamy in Lysimachia arvensis. Plant Species Biology. 34(1). 31–37. 8 indexed citations
16.
Käfer, Jos, Gabriel Marais, & John R. Pannell. (2017). On the rarity of dioecy in flowering plants. Molecular Ecology. 26(5). 1225–1241. 98 indexed citations
17.
Moore, Jamie & John R. Pannell. (2011). Sexual selection in plants. Current Biology. 21(5). R176–R182. 113 indexed citations
18.
Pannell, John R. & G. Korbecka. (2010). Mating-System Evolution: Rise of the Irresistible Males. Current Biology. 20(11). R482–R484. 14 indexed citations
19.
Korbecka, G., Paul D. Rymer, Stephen A. Harris, & John R. Pannell. (2010). Solving the Problem of Ambiguous Paralogy for Marker Loci: Microsatellite Markers with Diploid Inheritance in Allohexaploid Mercurialis annua (Euphorbiaceae). Journal of Heredity. 101(4). 504–511. 11 indexed citations
20.
Gleiser, Gabriela, José Gabriel Segarra‐Moragues, John R. Pannell, & Miguel Verdú. (2008). Siring Success and Paternal Effects in Heterodichogamous Acer opalus. Annals of Botany. 101(7). 1017–1026. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026