Sarah M. Eppley

1.4k total citations
41 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Sarah M. Eppley is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah M. Eppley has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 20 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 15 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Sarah M. Eppley's work include Plant and animal studies (20 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (20 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (19 papers). Sarah M. Eppley is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (20 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (20 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (19 papers). Sarah M. Eppley collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Sarah M. Eppley's co-authors include John R. Pannell, Linley K. Jesson, Todd N. Rosenstiel, Catherine H Mercer, Erin E. Shortlidge, Philip Taylor, Lloyd R. Stark, D. Nicholas McLetchie, Richard K. Grosberg and Maureen L. Stanton and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Trends in Ecology & Evolution and Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Sarah M. Eppley

41 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah M. Eppley United States 22 840 539 357 220 150 41 1.1k
Jairo Patiño Spain 25 1.3k 1.6× 942 1.7× 256 0.7× 358 1.6× 104 0.7× 89 1.7k
Patrick J. Brownsey New Zealand 22 1.3k 1.6× 523 1.0× 356 1.0× 94 0.4× 238 1.6× 95 1.6k
Marianne Philipp Denmark 18 556 0.7× 422 0.8× 278 0.8× 96 0.4× 203 1.4× 45 744
Yves Piquot France 17 594 0.7× 506 0.9× 418 1.2× 265 1.2× 170 1.1× 25 1.2k
Jakob Schneller Switzerland 20 958 1.1× 666 1.2× 327 0.9× 166 0.8× 180 1.2× 59 1.3k
J. F. Scheepens Germany 18 589 0.7× 489 0.9× 520 1.5× 262 1.2× 137 0.9× 60 1.2k
J. Alfredo Reyes‐Betancort Spain 17 396 0.5× 400 0.7× 164 0.5× 86 0.4× 154 1.0× 54 816
Cecilia Ezcurra Argentina 20 769 0.9× 464 0.9× 475 1.3× 209 0.9× 244 1.6× 75 1.2k
Josef Greimler Austria 14 328 0.4× 292 0.5× 225 0.6× 108 0.5× 129 0.9× 42 640
Alexandre K. Monro United Kingdom 12 519 0.6× 223 0.4× 390 1.1× 174 0.8× 200 1.3× 46 998

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah M. Eppley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah M. Eppley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah M. Eppley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah M. Eppley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah M. Eppley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah M. Eppley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah M. Eppley. The network helps show where Sarah M. Eppley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah M. Eppley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah M. Eppley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah M. Eppley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah M. Eppley. Sarah M. Eppley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shortlidge, Erin E., Sarah B. Carey, Antony Payton, et al.. (2021). Microarthropod contributions to fitness variation in the common moss Ceratodon purpureus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 288(1947). 20210119–20210119. 12 indexed citations
3.
Slate, Mandy L., Todd N. Rosenstiel, & Sarah M. Eppley. (2017). Sex-specific morphological and physiological differences in the moss Ceratodon purpureus (Dicranales). Annals of Botany. 120(5). 845–854. 27 indexed citations
4.
Stark, Lloyd R., D. Nicholas McLetchie, Joshua L. Greenwood, & Sarah M. Eppley. (2016). Moss antheridia are desiccation tolerant: Rehydration dynamics influence sperm release in Bryum argenteum. American Journal of Botany. 103(5). 856–864. 13 indexed citations
5.
Shortlidge, Erin E., Sarah M. Eppley, H Köhler, et al.. (2016). Passive warming reduces stress and shifts reproductive effort in the Antarctic moss,Polytrichastrum alpinum. Annals of Botany. 119(1). 27–38. 21 indexed citations
6.
Rosenstiel, Todd N., et al.. (2016). Distribution drivers and physiological responses in geothermal bryophyte communities. American Journal of Botany. 103(4). 625–634. 9 indexed citations
7.
Mercer, Catherine H & Sarah M. Eppley. (2014). Kin and sex recognition in a dioecious grass. Plant Ecology. 215(8). 845–852. 26 indexed citations
8.
Rosenstiel, Todd N., et al.. (2012). Sex-specific volatile compounds influence microarthropod-mediated fertilization of moss. Nature. 489(7416). 431–433. 58 indexed citations
9.
Mercer, Catherine H & Sarah M. Eppley. (2010). Inter-sexual competition in a dioecious grass. Oecologia. 164(3). 657–664. 33 indexed citations
11.
Eppley, Sarah M., et al.. (2009). New sequence‐tagged site molecular markers for identification of sex in Distichlis spicata. Molecular Ecology Resources. 9(5). 1373–1374. 7 indexed citations
12.
Eppley, Sarah M., et al.. (2009). Sex‐specific variation in the interaction between Distichlis spicata (Poaceae) and mycorrhizal fungi. American Journal of Botany. 96(11). 1967–1973. 37 indexed citations
13.
Eppley, Sarah M. & Linley K. Jesson. (2008). Moving to mate: the evolution of separate and combined sexes in multicellular organisms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 21(3). 727–736. 58 indexed citations
14.
Eppley, Sarah M. & John R. Pannell. (2007). DENSITY-DEPENDENT SELF-FERTILIZATION AND MALE VERSUS HERMAPHRODITE SIRING SUCCESS IN AN ANDRODIOECIOUS PLANT. Evolution. 61(10). 2349–2359. 63 indexed citations
15.
Taylor, Philip, Sarah M. Eppley, & Linley K. Jesson. (2007). Sporophytic inbreeding depression in mosses occurs in a species with separate sexes but not in a species with combined sexes. American Journal of Botany. 94(11). 1853–1859. 40 indexed citations
16.
Eppley, Sarah M., Philip Taylor, & Linley K. Jesson. (2006). Self-fertilization in mosses: a comparison of heterozygote deficiency between species with combined versus separate sexes. Heredity. 98(1). 38–44. 59 indexed citations
17.
Eppley, Sarah M. & John R. Pannell. (2006). Sexual Systems and Measures of Occupancy and Abundance in an Annual Plant: Testing the Metapopulation Model. The American Naturalist. 169(1). 20–28. 31 indexed citations
18.
Eppley, Sarah M.. (2005). Females make tough neighbors: sex-specific competitive effects in seedlings of a dioecious grass. Oecologia. 146(4). 549–554. 56 indexed citations
19.
Pannell, John R., Marcel E. Dorken, & Sarah M. Eppley. (2005). ‘Haldane's Sieve’ in a metapopulation: sifting through plant reproductive polymorphisms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 20(7). 374–379. 30 indexed citations
20.
Eppley, Sarah M., Maureen L. Stanton, & Richard K. Grosberg. (1998). Intrapopulation Sex Ratio Variation in the Salt GrassDistichlis spicata. The American Naturalist. 152(5). 659–670. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026