John R. Naber
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions 3
- Radical Photochemical Reactions 3
- Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions 3
- Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions 3
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation 19
- Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications 4
- Pharmaceutical Science top 5%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 8
-
- Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 3
- Co-authors
- Stephen L. BuchwaldRyan L. HartmanKlavs F. JensenJonathan P. McMullenFrançois LévesqueNikolay ZaborenkoTimothy NoëlMichael K. Wismer
- Journals
- Organic Process Research & Development (9 papers)Angewandte Chemie International Edition (4 papers)ChemPhotoChem (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
John R. Naber
27 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Organic Chemistry 615
- Biomedical Engineering 847
- Pharmaceutical Science 81
- Inorganic Chemistry 131
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 87
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Naber
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Naber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Naber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Naber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Naber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Naber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Naber. The network helps show where John R. Naber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John R. Naber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 100 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 99 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 193 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 120 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 46 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 15 |
About John R. Naber
John R. Naber is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (19 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (8 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (4 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (3 papers), Radical Photochemical Reactions (3 papers), Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (3 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (3 papers) and Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (615 citations), Biomedical Engineering (847 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (81 citations). John R. Naber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Stephen L. Buchwald, Ryan L. Hartman, Klavs F. Jensen, Jonathan P. McMullen, François Lévesque, Nikolay Zaborenko, Timothy Noël, Michael K. Wismer, Emily B. Corcoran and David A. Thaisrivongs. Their work appears in journals such as Organic Process Research & Development, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, ChemPhotoChem, Chemical Science and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.