Feng Peng
- Organic Chemistry top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ning JiaoSamuel J. DanishefskyYu‐Feng LiangDennis G. HallChun ZhangYuxin CuiMichael ShevlinJacob H. Waldman
- Topics
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (16 papers)Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (12 papers)Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (10 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyAngewandte Chemie International Edition
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Feng Peng
90 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Organic Chemistry 1.8k
- Molecular Biology 726
- Inorganic Chemistry 295
- Materials Chemistry 286
- Biomedical Engineering 285
Countries citing papers authored by Feng Peng
This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Peng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Peng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Peng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Peng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Peng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Peng. The network helps show where Feng Peng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Feng Peng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Feng Peng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Feng Peng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Feng Peng. Feng Peng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | General Principles and Strategies for Salting-Out Informed by the Hofmeister Seriesbreakdown → | 373 |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 55 |
About Feng Peng
Feng Peng is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Oncology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 95 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (16 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (12 papers) and Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (1.8k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (295 citations) and Filtration and Separation (41 citations). Feng Peng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ning Jiao, Samuel J. Danishefsky, Yu‐Feng Liang, Dennis G. Hall, Chun Zhang, Yuxin Cui, Michael Shevlin, Jacob H. Waldman, Yong‐Li Zhong and Alan M. Hyde. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.