John R. Donahue

510 citations
23 papers · 196 indexed · h-index 8
Topics
Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (5 papers)Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (5 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

John R. Donahue

16 papers receiving 133 citations

Peers

John R. Donahue
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Religious studies 113
  • Sociology and Political Science 81
  • Archeology 55
  • Surgery 30
  • Epidemiology 29
Replace James L. Mays with:
James L. Mays United States
Joseph Barber Lightfoot United Kingdom
Ellen F. Davis United States
Robert W. Yarbrough United States
Esther Fuchs United States
Klijn Netherlands
Alexander Rofé Australia
Graydon F. Snyder United States
Michael F. Bird Australia
Javier Teixidor Spain
John R. Donahue relative to James L. Mays United States James L. Mays's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James L. Mays · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John R. Donahue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Donahue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Donahue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Donahue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Donahue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Donahue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Donahue. The network helps show where John R. Donahue may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Donahue

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Donahue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Donahue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Donahue. John R. Donahue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Seek Justice That You May Live: Reflections and Resources on the Bible and Social Justice
1
2 0
3
The whence and whither of the Johannine community
0
4
The Gospel of Mark
38
5 8
6 2
7
Redaction Criticism: Has the Hauptstrasse Become a Sackgasse?
0
8 33
9 7
10 30
11 22
12
The theology and setting of discipleship in the gospel of Mark
6
13 0
14 13
15 4
16 6
17 1
18 14
19
Are you the Christ
4
20 3

About John R. Donahue

John R. Donahue is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (13 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (5 papers) and Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (113 citations), Archeology (55 citations) and Development (16 citations). John R. Donahue has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Harrington, John Dominic Crossan, Robert P. Good, Lawrence S. Miller, Timothy R. Bondelid, Richard H. McCuen, Michael J. Cook, Giles R. Scuderi, Thomas J. Schnitzer and Richard Holtby. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Clinical Therapeutics and Journal of Biblical Literature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026