John Poe

2.0k citations
6 papers · 892 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

John Poe

5 papers receiving 841 citations

Hit Papers

What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature 2023 · 674 citations
6742023202620242025200400600

Peers

John Poe
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Economics and Econometrics 356
  • Accounting 71
  • Political Science and International Relations 136
  • Sociology and Political Science 238
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 45
Replace Vivi Alatas with:
Vivi Alatas United States
Takaaki Masaki United States
Martı́n A. Rossi Argentina
Stephen B. Billings United States
Matthew D. Webb Canada
Kirill Borusyak United States
Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna United States
Robert Breunig Australia
Kurt Schmidheiny Switzerland
Bruno Ferman Brazil
John Poe relative to Vivi Alatas United States Vivi Alatas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Vivi Alatas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Poe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Poe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Poe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Poe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Poe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Poe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Poe. The network helps show where John Poe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside John Poe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Poe Line = papers co-authored together John Poe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2
What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature
Hit paper breakdown →
2023674
3 2018107
4 201662
5 201210
6
Alienation: An Explanation of High Dropout Rates among African American and Latino Students.
199139

About John Poe

John Poe is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Education, having authored 6 papers that have together received 892 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (2 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (1 paper), Climate Change Policy and Economics (1 paper) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (356 citations), Accounting (71 citations), Political Science and International Relations (136 citations), Sociology and Political Science (238 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (45 citations). John Poe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alyssa Bilinski, Jonathan Roth, Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna, Rebecca Bromley‐Trujillo, Raymond L. Calabrese, J. S. Butler, Richard W. Waterman, Andrew M. Ryan, Ishani Ganguli and Youjin Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Policy, Statistics in Medicine, Social Science Quarterly, Review of Policy Research and Journal of Econometrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026