John Peradotto

742 citations
17 papers · 171 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 10%
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies 5
    • Historical and Literary Studies 2
    • Byzantine Studies and History 2

John Peradotto

14 papers receiving 98 citations

Peers

John Peradotto
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Anthropology 108
  • Classics 17
  • Philosophy 51
  • General Arts and Humanities 4
  • Archeology 26
Replace Helen H. Bacon with:
Helen H. Bacon
Marsh McCall
R. P. Winnington‐Ingram United Kingdom
W. B. Stanford Ireland
Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff
Aeschylus
C. J. Herington United Kingdom
Thomas K. Hubbard United States
David Bain United Kingdom
Stephen Scully United States
John Peradotto relative to Helen H. Bacon Helen H. Bacon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Helen H. Bacon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Peradotto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Peradotto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Peradotto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Peradotto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Peradotto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Peradotto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Peradotto. The network helps show where John Peradotto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside John Peradotto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Peradotto Line = papers co-authored together John Peradotto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20021
2 19960
3 19929
4 19922
5 19902
6
Gonimos : Neoplatonic and Byzantine studies presented to Leendert G. Westerink at 75
19888
7 198650
8 19828
9 19765
10 197239
11 19701
12 196916
13 19698
14 19674
15 19667
16 196410
17 19601

About John Peradotto

John Peradotto is a scholar working on Anthropology, Classics, Religious studies, Archeology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 17 papers that have together received 171 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (108 citations), Classics (17 citations), Philosophy (51 citations), General Arts and Humanities (4 citations) and Archeology (26 citations). Frequent co-authors include J. P. Sullivan, R. D. Dawe, John Duffy, G. S. Kirk, Gerald James Larson, George A. Kennedy, Jaan Puhvel, J. A. S. Evans, Jack Martin Balcer and Stewart Flory. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, The Classical World, Arethusa, Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) and Phoenix.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026