Jack Martin Balcer
- Archeology top 5%
- Ancient Near East History 9
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 3
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 2
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 2
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies 6
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 3
-
- Ancient Near East History 9
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 3
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 2
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 2
-
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 1
-
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 1
- Co-authors
- James WhitleyP. J. CaseyJohn R. AldenHermann BengtsonJ. A. S. EvansStewart FloryJohn PeradottoDeborah Boedeker
- Cited by
- ArcheologyAnthropology
In The Last Decade
Jack Martin Balcer
16 papers receiving 61 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Archeology 67
- Anthropology 60
- Archeology 3
- Classics 8
- Paleontology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Martin Balcer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Martin Balcer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Martin Balcer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Martin Balcer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Martin Balcer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Martin Balcer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Martin Balcer. The network helps show where Jack Martin Balcer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jack Martin Balcer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Persian Conquest of the Greeks, 545-450 B.C. | 1993 | 13 |
| 2 | A Prosopographical Study of the Ancient Persians Royal and Noble, C. 550-450 B.C. | 1993 | 4 |
| 3 | 1992 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 2 | |
| 6 | Herodotus & Bisitun : problems in ancient Persian historiography | 1987 | 6 |
| 7 | 1987 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 9 | Sparda by the Bitter Sea: Imperial Interaction in Western Anatolia | 1985 | 13 |
| 10 | Studien zum Attischen Seebund | 1984 | 2 |
| 11 | 1978 | 4 | |
| 12 | The Athenian regulations for Chalkis : studies in Athenian imperial law | 1978 | 4 |
| 13 | 1977 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1974 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1973 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1972 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1971 | 3 |
About Jack Martin Balcer
Jack Martin Balcer is a scholar working on Archeology, Anthropology and Classics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 105 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ancient Near East History (9 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (6 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (3 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (67 citations), Anthropology (60 citations) and Archeology (3 citations). Frequent co-authors include James Whitley, P. J. Casey, John R. Alden, Hermann Bengtson, J. A. S. Evans, Stewart Flory, John Peradotto and Deborah Boedeker.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.