John O. Link

36 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

John O. Link
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Hepatology 437
  • Electrochemistry 164
  • Organic Chemistry 747
  • Pharmaceutical Science 126
  • Inorganic Chemistry 271
Replace Michal Hocek with:
Michal Hocek Czechia
Nobuo Shimma Japan
Pierre L. Beaulieu Canada
Ramachandra S. Hosmane United States
Kent D. Stewart United States
Carlo Scolastico Italy
John S. Driscoll United States
Christian Périgaud France
James A. Kelley United States
Tarek S. Mansour United States
John O. Link relative to Michal Hocek Czechia Michal Hocek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Michal Hocek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John O. Link

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John O. Link's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John O. Link with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John O. Link more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John O. Link

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John O. Link. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John O. Link. The network helps show where John O. Link may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John O. Link, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John O. Link Line = papers co-authored together John O. Link links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991448
2 1992209
3 1989122
4 2012120
5 1992108
6 199195
7 199489
8 199185
9 199278
10 201665
11 199264
12 200161
13 201650
14 199050
15 199245
16 201538
17 201338
18 199636
19 199236
20 201234

About John O. Link

John O. Link is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Hepatology, Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatitis C virus research (10 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (8 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (8 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (7 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (6 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (6 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (437 citations), Electrochemistry (164 citations), Organic Chemistry (747 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (126 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (271 citations). John O. Link has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include E. J. Corey, John H. Kenten, Jonathan K. Leland, David B. Talley, M.J. Powell, Gary F. Blackburn, Haresh P. Shah, Yang Shao, Diana M. Brainard and Richard Massey. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Journal of Hepatology, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Clinical Chemistry and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact