John Murray–Bruce

658 citations
27 papers · 416 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John Murray–Bruce

24 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

John Murray–Bruce
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 200
  • Instrumentation 217
  • Structural Biology 22
  • Computational Mathematics 4
  • Biophysics 35
Replace Gregory A. Howland with:
Gregory A. Howland United States
Yanting Ma United States
Marta M. Betcke United Kingdom
Verónica Fernández Spain
Jianhong Shi China
Guang Wu China
Dayan Li China
G. R. Ayers United Kingdom
István Gyöngy United Kingdom
Amit Ashok United States
John Murray–Bruce relative to Gregory A. Howland United States Gregory A. Howland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Gregory A. Howland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Murray–Bruce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Murray–Bruce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Murray–Bruce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Murray–Bruce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Murray–Bruce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Murray–Bruce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Murray–Bruce. The network helps show where John Murray–Bruce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 16 scholars most cited alongside John Murray–Bruce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Murray–Bruce Line = papers co-authored together John Murray–Bruce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20247
2 20240
3 202211
4 20224
5 202174
6 202113
7 202029
8 20206
9 202015
10 2019140
11 20197
12 20191
13 201925
14 20183
15 201717
16 20161
17 20163
18 20165
19
Reconstructing diffusion fields sampled with a network of arbitrarily distributed sensors
20145
20 201410

About John Murray–Bruce

John Murray–Bruce is a scholar working on Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Instrumentation, Structural Biology, Biophysics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (14 papers), Random lasers and scattering media (10 papers), Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks (6 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (5 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (4 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (4 papers) and Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (200 citations), Instrumentation (217 citations), Structural Biology (22 citations), Computational Mathematics (4 citations) and Biophysics (35 citations). John Murray–Bruce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Vivek K Goyal, Charles Saunders, Pier Luigi Dragotti, Shuhui Li, Daniel J. Lum, David B. Phillips, Tomáš Čižmár, Christopher Yu, Yanting Ma and William T. Freeman. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, Ultramicroscopy, Nature Communications and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026