John Mullarkey

643 citations
20 papers · 151 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis
    • Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism

Papers in

John Mullarkey

18 papers receiving 119 citations

Peers

John Mullarkey
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • General Psychology 11
  • Philosophy 64
  • History and Philosophy of Science 20
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 14
  • Cultural Studies 14
Replace Frederick Burwick with:
Frederick Burwick United States
Michael A. Screech United Kingdom
Sophia Rosenfeld United States
Bernard Bosanquet
Claire Kahane United States
Richard Noakes United Kingdom
Thomas F. Cleary
Daniel Breazeale United States
Benjamin Reiss United States
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke United Kingdom
John Mullarkey relative to Frederick Burwick United States Frederick Burwick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Frederick Burwick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mullarkey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mullarkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mullarkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mullarkey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mullarkey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mullarkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mullarkey. The network helps show where John Mullarkey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Mullarkey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mullarkey Line = papers co-authored together John Mullarkey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20199
2
Bergson and the Art of Immanence: Painting, Photography, Film
20133
3 20131
4 20120
5 20129
6 20121
7
Philosophy and the moving image : refractions of reality
20107
8
The Continuum companion to continental philosophy
20093
9 200811
10 200717
11 200410
12 20041
13 200321
14 20001
15 200034
16 19975
17 19950
18 19954
19 19944
20 199110

About John Mullarkey

John Mullarkey is a scholar working on General Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 20 papers that have together received 151 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (10 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (2 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (2 papers) and Social Representations and Identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (11 citations), Philosophy (64 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (20 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 citations) and Cultural Studies (14 citations). John Mullarkey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Linstead, Anthony Paul Smith and Beth Lord. Their work appears in journals such as Angelaki, The Modern Language Review, Metaphilosophy, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology and Theory Culture & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026