Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke
- Philosophy top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- History top 10%
- Co-authors
- Roger Eatwell
- Topics
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers)Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewChoice Reviews OnlineOxford University Press eBooks
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke
7 papers receiving 126 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Philosophy 90
- Sociology and Political Science 55
- Literature and Literary Theory 32
- Political Science and International Relations 27
- History 19
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke. The network helps show where Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke. Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | The occult roots of nazism : secret Aryan cults and their influence on nazi ideology - the Ariosophists of Austria and Germany, 1890-1935 | 15 |
| 7 | The Occult Roots of Nazism : Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on Nazi Ideology | 45 |
| 8 | The Occult Roots of Nazism : The Ariosophists of Austria and Germany 1890-1935 | 19 |
About Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology and Classics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (90 citations), General Psychology (5 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations). Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roger Eatwell. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Choice Reviews Online and Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.