John Moriarty

3.3k citations
68 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

John Moriarty

65 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

John Moriarty
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 834
  • Clinical Psychology 651
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 558
  • Philosophy 276
  • Public Administration 71
Replace Jeremy Holmes with:
Jeremy Holmes United Kingdom
Costas Stefanis Greece
Helen M. Sharp United Kingdom
J.I.M. Egger Netherlands
Tsung-Yi Lin Canada
David Owens United Kingdom
Ivana S. Marková United Kingdom
Catherine Gilvarry United Kingdom
Erik Parens United States
Laura Bell United Kingdom
John Moriarty relative to Jeremy Holmes United Kingdom Jeremy Holmes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Jeremy Holmes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Moriarty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Moriarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Moriarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Moriarty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Moriarty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Moriarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Moriarty. The network helps show where John Moriarty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Moriarty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Moriarty Line = papers co-authored together John Moriarty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994332
2 2010309
3 1998111
4 2021106
5 199780
6 199780
7 201377
8 199575
9 199966
10 199266
11 202062
12
Regional cerebral perfusion in Landau-Kleffner syndrome and related childhood aphasias.
199245
13 199244
14 199238
15 199435
16 201133
17 199730
18 202129
19 199627
20 201327

About John Moriarty

John Moriarty is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (11 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (10 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (9 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (8 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (7 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (6 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (834 citations), Clinical Psychology (651 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (558 citations), Philosophy (276 citations) and Public Administration (71 citations). John Moriarty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Howard Ring, Michael Trimble, Durval C. Costa, Peter J. Ell, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Bettina Schmitz, John D. C. Mellers, Laura H. Goldstein, Trudie Chalder and Mizanur Khondoker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, The British Journal of Social Work, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Epilepsy Research and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026