John Memmott

404 total citations
8 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

John Memmott is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John Memmott has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 1 paper in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 1 paper in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in John Memmott's work include RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers). John Memmott is often cited by papers focused on RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers). John Memmott collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. John Memmott's co-authors include Athena Andreadis, Stefan Stamm, Lewis S. Nelson, Kyuhyung Kim, Gavin Screaton, Robert Lafyatis, Annette M. Hartmann, Qingsheng Gao, Harald König and Oliver Stoß and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Neurochemistry and Neurobiology of Disease.

In The Last Decade

John Memmott

8 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Memmott United States	7	242	88	85	53	30	8	339
Miranda C. Dyson United Kingdom	6	114 0.5×	112 1.3×	42 0.5×	78 1.5×	83 2.8×	7	273
Laura DeVault United States	8	106 0.4×	24 0.3×	96 1.1×	48 0.9×	46 1.5×	8	254
Matthew G. Andrusiak Canada	10	274 1.1×	20 0.2×	63 0.7×	62 1.2×	17 0.6×	11	399
S. Yu. Funikov Russia	12	222 0.9×	53 0.6×	39 0.5×	20 0.4×	43 1.4×	36	319
Jodi Meltzer United States	3	189 0.8×	47 0.5×	93 1.1×	22 0.4×	5 0.2×	3	293
Délara Sabéran‐Djoneidi France	12	279 1.2×	32 0.4×	62 0.7×	26 0.5×	15 0.5×	15	368
Eugene Jennifer Jin United States	9	238 1.0×	86 1.0×	143 1.7×	27 0.5×	72 2.4×	11	485
Philipp Christoph Janiesch Germany	9	424 1.8×	19 0.2×	97 1.1×	39 0.7×	55 1.8×	10	531
Muriel Desbois United States	8	167 0.7×	28 0.3×	89 1.0×	118 2.2×	7 0.2×	14	305
Wen Jing Law United States	6	146 0.6×	24 0.3×	47 0.6×	99 1.9×	66 2.2×	8	325

Countries citing papers authored by John Memmott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Memmott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Memmott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Memmott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Memmott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Memmott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Memmott. The network helps show where John Memmott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Memmott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Memmott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Memmott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Memmott. John Memmott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Huang, Lili, Emma Fung, Sahana Bose, et al.. (2021). Elezanumab, a clinical stage human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets repulsive guidance molecule A to promote neuroregeneration and neuroprotection in neuronal injury and demyelination models. Neurobiology of Disease. 159. 105492–105492. 14 indexed citations

2.

Chen, Lei, et al.. (2015). Preferential germline usage and VH/VL pairing observed in human antibodies selected by mRNA display. Protein Engineering Design and Selection. 28(10). 427–435. 5 indexed citations

3.

Luo, Min‐Hua, Sze‐Wah Tse, John Memmott, & Athena Andreadis. (2004). Novel isoforms of tau that lack the microtubule‐binding domain. Journal of Neurochemistry. 90(2). 340–351. 37 indexed citations

4.

Arıkan, Meltem, John Memmott, Jennifer A. Broderick, et al.. (2002). Modulation of the membrane-binding projection domain of tau protein: splicing regulation of exon 3. Molecular Brain Research. 101(1-2). 109–121. 24 indexed citations

5.

Stoß, Oliver, Annette M. Hartmann, Harald König, et al.. (2001). The STAR/GSG Family Protein rSLM-2 Regulates the Selection of Alternative Splice Sites. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276(12). 8665–8673. 86 indexed citations

6.

Memmott, John, et al.. (2000). The splicing determinants of a regulated exon in the axonal MAP tau reside within the exon and in its upstream intron. Molecular Brain Research. 80(2). 207–218. 19 indexed citations

7.

Gao, Qingsheng, John Memmott, Robert Lafyatis, et al.. (2000). Complex Regulation of Tau Exon 10, Whose Missplicing Causes Frontotemporal Dementia. Journal of Neurochemistry. 74(2). 490–500. 72 indexed citations

8.

Nelson, Lewis S., et al.. (1998). FMRFamide-related gene family in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Molecular Brain Research. 58(1-2). 103–111. 82 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact