Protein Engineering Design and Selection
About
In The Last Decade
Protein Engineering Design and Selection
3.4k papers receiving 133.6k citations
Fields of papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection
This network shows the impact of papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection.
Countries where authors publish in Protein Engineering Design and Selection
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Protein Engineering Design and Selection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Protein Engineering Design and Selection more than expected).
- Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites (1997)
- LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions (1995)
- The <i>α</i>/<i>β</i> hydrolase fold (1992)
- Crystal structure of human serum albumin at 2.5 Å resolution (1999)
- Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path (1998)
- ALSCRIPT: a tool to format multiple sequence alignments (1993)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.