John McLevey

605 citations
20 papers · 287 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John McLevey

20 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

John McLevey
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • History and Philosophy of Science 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 152
  • Information Systems and Management 24
  • General Social Sciences 10
  • Communication 19
Replace Meiko Makita with:
Meiko Makita United Kingdom
Diego Kozlowski Canada
James G. Ennis United States
Amalia Más-Bleda United Kingdom
William Evans United States
Federico Bianchi Italy
David Johann Switzerland
Katarina Prpić Croatia
Howard Bloom United States
Raphael Silberzahn United Kingdom
John McLevey relative to Meiko Makita United Kingdom Meiko Makita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Meiko Makita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John McLevey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John McLevey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McLevey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McLevey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John McLevey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McLevey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McLevey. The network helps show where John McLevey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside John McLevey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John McLevey Line = papers co-authored together John McLevey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201886
2 201638
3 201828
4 201422
5 202420
6 202213
7 201512
8 201910
9 201610
10 20228
11 20218
12 20216
13 20206
14 20215
15 20225
16 20204
17 20222
18
Industrial Development and Eco-Tourisms: Can Oil Extraction and Nature Conservation Co-Exist?
20202
19 20231
20 20231

About John McLevey

John McLevey is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, General Social Sciences, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Strategy and Management, having authored 20 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (3 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers), Global Energy and Sustainability Research (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations), Sociology and Political Science (152 citations), Information Systems and Management (24 citations), General Social Sciences (10 citations) and Communication (19 citations). John McLevey has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Owen Gallupe, Peter J. Carrington, James G. Scott, Mark C. J. Stoddart, Robert Evans, Catherine Mei Ling Wong, Vanessa Schweizer, Eric B. Kennedy, Martin Innes and Alice Mattoni. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, Synthese, Social Networks, Social Studies of Science and Journal of Quantitative Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact