John McKay

48 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers

John McKay
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Family Practice 95
  • Health Information Management 164
  • Pharmacy 129
  • Emergency Medical Services 184
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 15
Replace Elizabeth Lewton with:
Elizabeth Lewton United States
Diane C. Pinakiewicz United States
Julianne M. Morath United States
Julián Vitaller Spain
Suzanne R Graham United States
Helen Hogan United Kingdom
John C. Morey United States
Susanna Tella Finland
Carole Doherty United Kingdom
Steven J. Kravet United States
John McKay relative to Elizabeth Lewton United States Elizabeth Lewton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Elizabeth Lewton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John McKay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John McKay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McKay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McKay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John McKay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McKay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McKay. The network helps show where John McKay may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John McKay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John McKay Line = papers co-authored together John McKay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201554
2 202045
3 200938
4 201632
5 201528
6 200524
7 201418
8 201217
9 200716
10 201616
11 201515
12
Audit and summative assessment: a criterion-referenced marking schedule.
199515
13 201115
14 201314
15 201613
16
Learning issues raised by the educational peer review of significant event analyses in general practice
200512
17 199512
18 199512
19 201511
20 200711

About John McKay

John McKay is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Information Management, Emergency Medical Services and Family Practice, having authored 48 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (16 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (14 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (13 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (11 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Radiology practices and education (5 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (95 citations), Health Information Management (164 citations), Pharmacy (129 citations), Emergency Medical Services (184 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (15 citations). John McKay has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Bowie, Murray Lough, Carl de Wet, Duncan McNab, T S Murray, Daniel Kobewka, Sunita Mulpuru, Alan J. Forster, Paul E. Ronksley and Steven Shorrock. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, BMJ Open, BMC Medical Education and BMC Family Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact