John McDermott

655 citations
28 papers · 263 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

John McDermott

26 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

John McDermott
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Economics and Econometrics 183
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 55
  • Business and International Management 7
  • Development 12
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 23
Replace Aljaž Kunčič with:
Aljaž Kunčič Slovenia
Enrico Colombatto Italy
John M. Litwack United States
Robert Vergeer Netherlands
Shahid Yusuf United States
Fausto Hernández Trillo Mexico
Francesca Recanatini United States
Lucas Navarro Chile
Raymond Torres Switzerland
Alan Finkelstein Shapiro United States
John McDermott relative to Aljaž Kunčič Slovenia Aljaž Kunčič's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Aljaž Kunčič · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John McDermott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John McDermott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John McDermott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John McDermott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John McDermott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John McDermott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John McDermott. The network helps show where John McDermott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside John McDermott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John McDermott Line = papers co-authored together John McDermott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200559
2 199932
3 200224
4 199915
5 201115
6 198714
7 199414
8 198914
9 200412
10 201310
11
Inflation Targeting in New Zealand: An Experience in Evolution
20189
12 20137
13 20136
14 20215
15 20204
16 20104
17 19974
18
Trust and the Distribution of Caution
20092
19 19982
20 20012

About John McDermott

John McDermott is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 28 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Growth and Productivity (8 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (6 papers), Economic theories and models (6 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (5 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers) and Economic Policies and Impacts (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (183 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (55 citations), Business and International Management (7 citations), Development (12 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (23 citations). John McDermott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Joilson Dias, Marvin Goodfriend, Janice Boucher Breuer, Rebecca Williams, William Hauk, Jeffrey B. Miller and Warren E. Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Growth, Journal of Development Economics, Public Choice, Journal of International Economics and Journal of Economics and Business.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact