John M. Ruth
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Pollution top 10%
- Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Papers in
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 6
-
- Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds 2
- Co-authors
- James D. Mold (5 shared papers)Philip C. Kearney (4 shared papers)Robert K. Stevens (4 shared papers)Robert M. Silverstein (2 shared papers)Robert G. Brownlee (2 shared papers)John C. Moser (2 shared papers)James H. Tumlinson (2 shared papers)Vincent P. Flanagan (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (6 papers)Analytical Chemistry (4 papers)Biochemistry (3 papers)Chemosphere (2 papers)Nature (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalySingapore
In The Last Decade
John M. Ruth
36 papers receiving 741 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Insect Science 132
- Pollution 101
- Spectroscopy 127
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 102
- Genetics 159
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Ruth
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Ruth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Ruth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Ruth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Ruth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Ruth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Ruth. The network helps show where John M. Ruth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John M. Ruth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1971 | 94 | |
| 2 | 1981 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 62 | |
| 4 | 1972 | 55 | |
| 5 | 1963 | 48 | |
| 6 | 1972 | 43 | |
| 7 | 1970 | 42 | |
| 8 | 1968 | 41 | |
| 9 | 1964 | 39 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 31 | |
| 12 | 1966 | 29 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 28 | |
| 14 | 1964 | 22 | |
| 15 | 1966 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1972 | 21 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1966 | 18 | |
| 19 | 1975 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1955 | 16 |
About John M. Ruth
John M. Ruth is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 36 papers that have together received 871 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (3 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (2 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (2 papers), Dye analysis and toxicity (2 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (2 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (132 citations), Pollution (101 citations), Spectroscopy (127 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (102 citations) and Genetics (159 citations). John M. Ruth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include James D. Mold, Philip C. Kearney, Robert K. Stevens, Robert M. Silverstein, Robert G. Brownlee, John C. Moser, James H. Tumlinson, Vincent P. Flanagan, Aldo Ferretti and D.L. Wood. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Analytical Chemistry, Biochemistry, Chemosphere and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.