John M. Popovich
- Surgery top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kornelia KuligN. Peter ReevesJacek CholewickiClark J. RadcliffeJongeun ChoiAngela S. LeeGeorge J. BeneckJerome Danoff
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (22 papers)Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (14 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers)
- Cited by
- Orthopedics and Sports MedicinePharmacologyPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaAustralia
In The Last Decade
John M. Popovich
56 papers receiving 879 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Surgery 331
- Pharmacology 288
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 263
- Biomedical Engineering 249
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 196
Countries citing papers authored by John M. Popovich
This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Popovich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Popovich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Popovich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Popovich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Popovich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Popovich. The network helps show where John M. Popovich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Popovich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Popovich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Popovich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Popovich. John M. Popovich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | Comparison Between Liposomal Bupivacaine and Femoral Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. | 22 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About John M. Popovich
John M. Popovich is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Equine and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 58 papers that have together received 904 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (22 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (14 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (263 citations), Pharmacology (288 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (72 citations). John M. Popovich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kornelia Kulig, N. Peter Reeves, Jacek Cholewicki, Clark J. Radcliffe, Jongeun Choi, Angela S. Lee, George J. Beneck, Jerome Danoff, Joseph A. Shrader and Jo Armour Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Spine and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.