George J. Beneck
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kornelia KuligChristopher M. PowersDavid M. SelkowitzJohn M. PopovichRobert F. LandelLucinda L. BakerMichael FredericsonJohn Story
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (16 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (10 papers)Sports injuries and prevention (7 papers)
- Journals
- Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseArchives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationPhysical Therapy
- Partner nations
- United StatesIranSpain
In The Last Decade
George J. Beneck
25 papers receiving 570 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Pharmacology 367
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 234
- Surgery 234
- Biomedical Engineering 177
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 169
Countries citing papers authored by George J. Beneck
This map shows the geographic impact of George J. Beneck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George J. Beneck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George J. Beneck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George J. Beneck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George J. Beneck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George J. Beneck. The network helps show where George J. Beneck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George J. Beneck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George J. Beneck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George J. Beneck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George J. Beneck. George J. Beneck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 128 | |
| 14 | 125 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About George J. Beneck
George J. Beneck is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (16 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (10 papers) and Sports injuries and prevention (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (367 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (169 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (234 citations). George J. Beneck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iran and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Kornelia Kulig, Christopher M. Powers, David M. Selkowitz, John M. Popovich, Robert F. Landel, Lucinda L. Baker, Michael Fredericson, John Story, Patrick M. Colletti and José Heredia‐Jimenez. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.