John Μ. King

1.5k citations
49 papers · 909 indexed · h-index 19

John Μ. King

49 papers receiving 815 citations

Peers

John Μ. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Equine 84
  • Small Animals 168
  • Parasitology 67
  • Animal Science and Zoology 83
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 79
Replace D. Phillip Sponenberg with:
D. Phillip Sponenberg United States
H. Craig Morton Norway
Peter Graham United Kingdom
J. Baker United Kingdom
Peter Cowen United States
Stevens Ce United States
Jay M. Harrison United States
Pamela E. Ginn United States
David H. Gribble United States
Gordon A. Andrews United States
John Μ. King relative to D. Phillip Sponenberg United States D. Phillip Sponenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
D. Phillip Sponenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Μ. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Μ. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Μ. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Μ. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Μ. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Μ. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Μ. King. The network helps show where John Μ. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Μ. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Μ. King Line = papers co-authored together John Μ. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
THE NECROPSY BOOK: A Guide for Veterinary Students, Residents, Clinicians, Pathologists, and Biological Researchers
201427
2
Adbusting: Critical Media Literacy in a Multi-Skills Academic Writing Lesson.
20086
3 200518
4 20027
5 200018
6 19995
7 19941
8 199443
9 19944
10 199379
11 199219
12 199163
13 199054
14 199014
15 19862
16 198519
17
Livestock water needs in pastoral Africa in relation to climate and forage
198379
18 198016
19 198055
20 19717

About John Μ. King

John Μ. King is a scholar working on Equine, Small Animals and Microbiology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 909 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (5 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (4 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (4 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (3 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (3 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers) and Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (84 citations), Small Animals (168 citations) and Parasitology (67 citations). John Μ. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen G. Dill, William C. Rebhun, Hollis N. Erb, Wayne I. Anderson, Mary A. Crawford, Louis Guida, Lois Roth, Lance F. Karcher, Richard Payne and Martha H. Stipanuk. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Anti-Cancer Drugs and Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026