Stephen G. Dill
- Equine top 1%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research 6
- Small Animals top 2%
- Animal health and immunology 5
- Helminth infection and control 3
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Parasitology top 10%
-
- Vector-Borne Animal Diseases 3
-
- Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus 3
-
- T-cell and Retrovirus Studies 2
-
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 1
-
- Neurological diseases and metabolism 1
- Co-authors
- William C. RebhunLance F. KarcherEdward J. DuboviJohn Μ. KingHelen T. PowerTracy W. FrenchWayne I. AndersonAlexander deLahunta
- Journals
- Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (11 papers)Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine (4 papers)American Journal of Veterinary Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen G. Dill
25 papers receiving 557 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Equine 164
- Small Animals 154
- Agronomy and Crop Science 165
- Parasitology 67
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 127
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen G. Dill
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen G. Dill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen G. Dill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen G. Dill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen G. Dill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen G. Dill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen G. Dill. The network helps show where Stephen G. Dill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen G. Dill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 46 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 54 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 117 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1989 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 51 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 17 | |
| 13 | White muscle disease in foals | 1985 | 22 |
| 14 | 1985 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1984 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 21 | |
| 18 | Gastric ulcers in foals. | 1982 | 43 |
| 19 | 1981 | 20 | |
| 20 | 1980 | 16 |
About Stephen G. Dill
Stephen G. Dill is a scholar working on Equine, Small Animals and Endocrinology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (6 papers), Animal health and immunology (5 papers), Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (3 papers), Helminth infection and control (3 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (3 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (1 paper) and Neurological diseases and metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (164 citations), Small Animals (154 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (165 citations). Stephen G. Dill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William C. Rebhun, Lance F. Karcher, Edward J. Dubovi, John Μ. King, Helen T. Power, Tracy W. French, Wayne I. Anderson, Alexander deLahunta, V. T. Rendano and Ronald C. Riis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Equine Veterinary Journal and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.