John M. Kennedy

4.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
136 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

John M. Kennedy is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Kennedy has authored 136 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 41 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 23 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in John M. Kennedy's work include Tactile and Sensory Interactions (35 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (32 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (20 papers). John M. Kennedy is often cited by papers focused on Tactile and Sensory Interactions (35 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (32 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (20 papers). John M. Kennedy collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Italy. John M. Kennedy's co-authors include M. H. Pirenne, Dan Chiappe, Igor Juricevic, John Vervaeke, Lochlan Magee, Morton A. Heller, Abraham S. Ross, Juan Bai, Colin Ware and Chang Hong Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

In The Last Decade

John M. Kennedy

125 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Optics, Painting and Photography 1972 2026 1990 2008 1972 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John M. Kennedy Canada 28 1.4k 1.1k 577 261 233 136 2.5k
Lionel Standing Canada 20 1.4k 1.0× 649 0.6× 319 0.6× 104 0.4× 354 1.5× 80 2.4k
Alva Noë United States 21 3.5k 2.5× 1.4k 1.2× 1.7k 2.9× 50 0.2× 203 0.9× 57 4.5k
John B. Pittenger United States 21 1.6k 1.1× 917 0.8× 419 0.7× 138 0.5× 428 1.8× 42 2.4k
Mary A. Peterson United States 33 2.9k 2.1× 801 0.7× 596 1.0× 135 0.5× 557 2.4× 126 3.9k
Géry d’Ydewalle Belgium 29 1.3k 0.9× 713 0.6× 263 0.5× 51 0.2× 161 0.7× 135 2.7k
William P. Banks United States 26 1.7k 1.2× 672 0.6× 496 0.9× 69 0.3× 120 0.5× 102 2.8k
Margaret Jean Intons-Peterson United States 16 2.2k 1.6× 1.0k 0.9× 614 1.1× 141 0.5× 185 0.8× 38 3.3k
Jan B. Deręgowski United Kingdom 28 883 0.6× 1.1k 0.9× 471 0.8× 521 2.0× 218 0.9× 101 2.2k
Edward S. Reed United States 20 1.2k 0.8× 396 0.3× 737 1.3× 49 0.2× 82 0.4× 60 2.4k
Ruth Kimchi Israel 29 2.5k 1.8× 819 0.7× 650 1.1× 132 0.5× 337 1.4× 85 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Kennedy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Kennedy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Kennedy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Kennedy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Kennedy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Kennedy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Kennedy. The network helps show where John M. Kennedy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Kennedy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Kennedy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Kennedy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Kennedy. John M. Kennedy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lee, Dae‐Hyoung, John M. Kennedy, Donetta J. Cothran, et al.. (2025). Correlates of physical activity, sedentary time, and cardiovascular disease risk factors in autistic adults without intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 161. 104980–104980. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mastandrea, Stefano & John M. Kennedy. (2022). Extension of Dancer’s Legs: Increasing Angles Show Motion. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 706004–706004.
3.
Kennedy, John M., et al.. (2021). Foreshortening increases apparent angles. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 83(6). 2574–2582. 1 indexed citations
4.
Singh, Karan, et al.. (2015). Foreshortening produces errors in the perception of angles pictured as on the ground. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 78(1). 309–316. 9 indexed citations
5.
Kennedy, John M., et al.. (2013). Elevation easier than plan for sighted and early-blind adults in a perspective-taking task. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 75(6). 1186–1192. 3 indexed citations
6.
Kennedy, John M., et al.. (2012). Mirror image arm used in monocular, binocular, and blindfolded pointing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 20(1). 95–100. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kennedy, John M., et al.. (2010). Maniatis's Arguments about Impossibilities and Rigging in Hammad et al. (2008): the Importance of Pizlo (2008). PubMed. 23(1). 75–80. 2 indexed citations
8.
Juricevic, Igor, John M. Kennedy, & Israel Abramov. (2009). Foreshortened tiles in paths converging on an observer viewing a picture: Elevation and visual angle ratio determine perceived size. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 71(2). 217–224. 3 indexed citations
9.
Aviezer, Hillel, Shlomo Bentin, Ran R. Hassin, et al.. (2009). Not on the face alone: perception of contextualized face expressions in Huntington's disease. Brain. 132(6). 1633–1644. 64 indexed citations
10.
Juricevic, Igor, et al.. (2008). Angle illusion on a picture's surface. Spatial Vision. 21(3-5). 451–462. 8 indexed citations
11.
Heller, Morton A., et al.. (2006). Viewpoint and Orientation Influence Picture Recognition in the Blind. Perception. 35(10). 1397–1420. 17 indexed citations
12.
Kennedy, John M. & Igor Juricevic. (2006). Blind man draws using diminution in three dimensions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 13(3). 506–509. 20 indexed citations
13.
Chiappe, Dan & John M. Kennedy. (2000). Are Metaphors Elliptical Similes?. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 29(4). 371–398. 35 indexed citations
14.
Mirabella, Giuseppe & John M. Kennedy. (1999). Which way is upright and normal? Haptic perception of letters above head level. Perception & Psychophysics. 61(5). 909–918. 2 indexed citations
15.
Liu, Chang Hong & John M. Kennedy. (1995). Misalignment effects in 3-D versions of Poggendorff displays. Perception & Psychophysics. 57(3). 409–415. 7 indexed citations
16.
Heller, Morton A., et al.. (1995). Production and Interpretation of Pictures of Houses by Blind People. Perception. 24(9). 1049–1058. 20 indexed citations
17.
Kennedy, John M., et al.. (1993). Foreshortening and the perception of parallel projections. Perception & Psychophysics. 54(5). 665–674. 10 indexed citations
18.
Kennedy, John M., et al.. (1993). Angular subtense effects on perception of polar and parallel projections of cubes. Perception & Psychophysics. 54(6). 763–772. 16 indexed citations
19.
Kennedy, John M., et al.. (1986). Metaphoric Devices in Drawings of Motion Mean the Same to the Blind and the Sighted. Perception. 15(2). 189–195. 13 indexed citations
20.
Kennedy, John M.. (1977). Ancient and Modern Picture- Perception Abilities in Africa. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 35(3). 293–300. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026