John M. Kabrick

2.8k total citations
129 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

John M. Kabrick is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, John M. Kabrick has authored 129 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 108 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 75 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 46 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in John M. Kabrick's work include Forest ecology and management (63 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (58 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (49 papers). John M. Kabrick is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (63 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (58 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (49 papers). John M. Kabrick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Algeria and Canada. John M. Kabrick's co-authors include Daniel C. Dey, Randy G. Jensen, Stephen R. Shifley, Brice B. Hanberry, Hong S. He, Benjamin O. Knapp, Zhaofei Fan, David R. Larsen, Eric K. Zenner and Michael Wallendorf and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Soil Science Society of America Journal and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

John M. Kabrick

118 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John M. Kabrick United States 26 1.4k 1.2k 745 357 290 129 2.0k
Daniel M. Kashian United States 22 844 0.6× 1.4k 1.1× 812 1.1× 346 1.0× 159 0.5× 44 1.8k
Daniel B. Tinker United States 22 944 0.7× 1.6k 1.3× 959 1.3× 309 0.9× 128 0.4× 40 2.1k
Ken Bible United States 8 1.1k 0.8× 1.2k 0.9× 471 0.6× 647 1.8× 166 0.6× 8 1.8k
Carolyn Hull Sieg United States 28 1.2k 0.9× 1.5k 1.3× 1.2k 1.6× 189 0.5× 331 1.1× 98 2.2k
Christopher D. Philipson Switzerland 16 1.3k 1.0× 1.3k 1.1× 482 0.6× 319 0.9× 421 1.5× 29 2.2k
W. Keith Moser United States 22 840 0.6× 814 0.7× 422 0.6× 288 0.8× 209 0.7× 88 1.3k
Juha Honkaniemi Finland 9 945 0.7× 1.4k 1.1× 615 0.8× 439 1.2× 218 0.8× 23 2.0k
Ralph D. Nyland United States 24 1.7k 1.2× 1.4k 1.1× 530 0.7× 817 2.3× 234 0.8× 73 2.3k
Sven Wagner Germany 19 878 0.6× 590 0.5× 396 0.5× 392 1.1× 330 1.1× 71 1.4k
Louis De Grandpré Canada 28 1.3k 0.9× 1.5k 1.2× 740 1.0× 783 2.2× 205 0.7× 61 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Kabrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Kabrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Kabrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Kabrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Kabrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Kabrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Kabrick. The network helps show where John M. Kabrick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John M. Kabrick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John M. Kabrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John M. Kabrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John M. Kabrick. John M. Kabrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dey, Daniel C., et al.. (2025). Regeneration Response to Shelterwood-Burn Treatments in a Dry Oak-Dominated Forest. Forest Science. 71(3). 371–396.
2.
3.
Nave, L. E., Grant M. Domke, Scott M. Holub, et al.. (2025). Land use change and forest management affect soil carbon stocks in the central hardwoods, U.S.. Geoderma Regional. 40. e00930–e00930. 1 indexed citations
4.
Duffy, Patrick, et al.. (2024). Response of understory vegetation to long-term occupancy by introduced Pinus species in temperate deciduous hardwood forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 572. 122310–122310.
5.
Knapp, Benjamin O., et al.. (2024). Effects of silvicultural release on artificial oak regeneration in bottomland hardwood forests in northern Missouri. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 54(11). 1254–1269.
6.
Fraser, Jacob S., Lauren S. Pile, Michael A. Jenkins, et al.. (2023). Carbon dynamics in old-growth forests of the Central Hardwoods Region, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 537. 120958–120958. 7 indexed citations
7.
Knapp, Benjamin O., et al.. (2023). Direct and indirect effects of fire on germination of shortleaf pine seeds. Fire Ecology. 19(1).
8.
Gustafson, Eric J., Christel C. Kern, & John M. Kabrick. (2022). Can assisted tree migration today sustain forest ecosystem goods and services for the future?. Forest Ecology and Management. 529. 120723–120723. 18 indexed citations
9.
Pile, Lauren S., Rebecca S. Snell, Todd F. Hutchinson, et al.. (2021). The ‘other’ hardwood: Growth, physiology, and dynamics of hickories in the Central Hardwood Region, USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 497. 119513–119513. 12 indexed citations
10.
Kern, Christel C., Laura S. Kenefic, Christian Kuehne, et al.. (2021). Relative influence of stand and site factors on aboveground live-tree carbon sequestration and mortality in managed and unmanaged forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 493. 119266–119266. 7 indexed citations
11.
Kern, Christel C., et al.. (2019). Mounds facilitate regeneration of light-seeded and browse-sensitive tree species after moderate-severity wind disturbance. Forest Ecology and Management. 437. 139–147. 17 indexed citations
12.
Stambaugh, Michael C., et al.. (2017). Mortality, scarring, and growth in an oak woodland following prescribed fire and commercial thinning in the Ozark Highlands. Forest Ecology and Management. 403. 12–26. 15 indexed citations
13.
Chen, Jiquan, Jing Xu, Randy G. Jensen, & John M. Kabrick. (2015). Changes in aboveground biomass following alternative harvesting in oak-hickory forests in the eastern USA. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry. 8(5). 652–660. 5 indexed citations
14.
Kabrick, John M., et al.. (2009). Growth and mortality of pin oak and pecan reforestation in a constructed wetland: analysis with management implications. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1(11). 1977–1979. 2 indexed citations
15.
Larsen, David R., et al.. (2007). The state of mixed shortleaf pine-upland oak management in Missouri. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 15. 38–49. 2 indexed citations
16.
Kabrick, John M., et al.. (2007). Shortleaf pine reproduction abundance and growth in pine-oak stands in the Missouri Ozarks. Likarska sprava. 15(1-2). 145–6. 3 indexed citations
17.
He, Hong S., et al.. (2006). Mapping pre-European settlement vegetation at fine resolutions using a hierarchical Bayesian model and GIS. Plant Ecology. 191(1). 85–94. 21 indexed citations
18.
Heitzman, Eric, Rose‐Marie Muzika, John M. Kabrick, & James M. Guldin. (2004). Assessment of Oak Decline in Missouri, Arkansas, and Oklahoma. 8 indexed citations
19.
Dey, Daniel C., et al.. (2003). Comparison of site preparation methods and stock types for artificial regeneration of oaks in bottomlands. 234. 13 indexed citations
20.
Larsen, David R., et al.. (1997). An Analysis of MOFEP Ground Flora: Pre-treatment Conditions. 169–197. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026