Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media
19692.0k citationsJohn Lysmer, Roger L. KuhlemeyerJournal of the Engineering Mechanics Divisionprofile →
Finite Element Method Accuracy for Wave Propagation Problems
19731.0k citationsRoger L. Kuhlemeyer, John LysmerJournal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Divisionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of John Lysmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lysmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lysmer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lysmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lysmer. The network helps show where John Lysmer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Lysmer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Lysmer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Lysmer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Lysmer. John Lysmer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chatti, Karim, John Lysmer, & C L Monismith. (1994). Dynamic Finite-Element Analysis of Jointed Concrete Pavements. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 79–90.22 indexed citations
2.
Bolt, Bruce A., et al.. (1993). Seismic condition assessment of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay bridge. 277–282.1 indexed citations
Sousa, Jorge B., et al.. (1988). EFFECTS OF DYNAMIC LOADS ON PERFORMANCE OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.21 indexed citations
5.
Monismith, C L, John Lysmer, Jorge B. Sousa, & J. Karl Hedrick. (1988). Truck Pavement Interactions - Requisite Research. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1.9 indexed citations
Lysmer, John, et al.. (1980). PLUSH: A COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR PROBABILISTIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION.8 indexed citations
8.
Lysmer, John. (1980). Foundation Vibrations with Soil Damping. 1–18.12 indexed citations
9.
Lysmer, John. (1978). Analytical Procedures in Soil Dynamics. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 80. 12243–1317.9 indexed citations
Kuhlemeyer, Roger L. & John Lysmer. (1973). Finite Element Method Accuracy for Wave Propagation Problems. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. 99(5). 421–427.1002 indexed citations breakdown →
Lysmer, John. (1969). Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4. 859–877.6 indexed citations
20.
Lysmer, John & Roger L. Kuhlemeyer. (1969). Finite Dynamic Model for Infinite Media. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division. 95(4). 859–877.1997 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.