John Losee

16 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

John Losee
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • History and Philosophy of Science 105
  • General Decision Sciences 14
  • General Psychology 9
  • Philosophy 35
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 35
Replace Arthur Donovan with:
Arthur Donovan United States
William Warren Bartley United States
Joseph C. Pitt United States
Matti Sintonen Finland
Hans Albert Germany
Adrienne van den Bogaard Netherlands
Hans Radder Netherlands
David Loye United States
Zeno G. Swijtink United States
Kenneth Laine Ketner United States
John Losee relative to Arthur Donovan United States Arthur Donovan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Arthur Donovan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Losee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Losee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Losee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Losee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Losee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Losee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Losee. The network helps show where John Losee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside John Losee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Losee Line = papers co-authored together John Losee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
A historical introduction to the philosophy of science
1972193
2 197555
3 195423
4
Theories of Scientific Progress: An Introduction
200318
5 200417
6 197614
7
Theories of Causality : From Antiquity to the Present
20129
8 19837
9 19914
10 19773
11 19662
12
Filosofía de la ciencia e investigación histórica
19892
13 19782
14 20231
15 19921
16 19921
17
Wissenschaftstheorie : eine historische Einführung
19770
18 19650
19 20190
20 20170

About John Losee

John Losee is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Educational theories and practices (2 papers), Science and Climate Studies (2 papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Historical Studies in Science (1 paper), Marine and fisheries research (1 paper) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (105 citations), General Decision Sciences (14 citations), General Psychology (9 citations), Philosophy (35 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (35 citations). John Losee has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include P. T. Landsberg, Augustine O. Allen, Harold A. Schwarz, Henrika Kuklick, Gustav Hellström, Tomas Brodin, Arne Holmgren, Daniel Palm and Atholl Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Marine Ecology Progress Series, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science and Leonardo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact