John L. Mace
Impact in
-
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Cancer Risks and Factors
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Papers in
- Oncology 6
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 5
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 3
- Cancer Risks and Factors 3
- Cancer survivorship and care 1
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Berta M. Geller (5 shared papers)Ted A. James (6 shared papers)Pamela M. Vacek (4 shared papers)Brian L. Sprague (4 shared papers)Donald L. Weaver (4 shared papers)Sally D. Herschorn (3 shared papers)Sarah Persing (2 shared papers)Beth A Virnig (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Radiology (2 papers)JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (1 paper)The Breast (1 paper)Annals of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)Journal of the American College of Surgeons (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John L. Mace
7 papers receiving 97 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Oncology 70
- Cancer Research 23
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 18
- Epidemiology 14
- Dermatology 3
Countries citing papers authored by John L. Mace
This map shows the geographic impact of John L. Mace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. Mace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. Mace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John L. Mace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. Mace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. Mace. The network helps show where John L. Mace may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside John L. Mace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 1 |
About John L. Mace
John L. Mace is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 97 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (3 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (3 papers), AI in cancer detection (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (70 citations), Cancer Research (23 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (18 citations), Epidemiology (14 citations) and Dermatology (3 citations). John L. Mace has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Berta M. Geller, Ted A. James, Pamela M. Vacek, Brian L. Sprague, Donald L. Weaver, Sally D. Herschorn, Sarah Persing, Beth A Virnig, Andrew Goodwin and Alison Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, The Breast, Annals of Surgical Oncology and Journal of the American College of Surgeons.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.