John J. Rieser

85 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

John J. Rieser
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Human-Computer Interaction 1.2k
  • Automotive Engineering 1.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.3k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 907
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 724
Replace Andrew C. Beall with:
Andrew C. Beall United States
Sarah H. Creem-Regehr United States
Jeanine K. Stefanucci United States
Herbert L. Pick United States
Bernhard E. Riecke Canada
Jonathan W. Kelly United States
Jodie M. Plumert United States
Timothy P. McNamara United States
Fred W. Mast Switzerland
Jack M. Loomis United States
John J. Rieser relative to Andrew C. Beall United States Andrew C. Beall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Andrew C. Beall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Rieser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Rieser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Rieser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Rieser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Rieser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Rieser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Rieser. The network helps show where John J. Rieser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John J. Rieser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Rieser Line = papers co-authored together John J. Rieser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989326
2 1990286
3 1986275
4 2007247
5 1989235
6 1986207
7 1995205
8 2007196
9 2006103
10 200698
11 199496
12 199584
13 198082
14 199381
15 199480
16 200872
17 200770
18 199267
19 199267
20 198266

About John J. Rieser

John J. Rieser is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Automotive Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 86 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (31 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (31 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (27 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (13 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (10 papers), Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (5 papers) and Geography Education and Pedagogy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (1.2k citations), Automotive Engineering (1.8k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.3k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (907 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (724 citations). John J. Rieser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Everett W. Hill, Daniel H. Ashmead, Herbert L. Pick, Bobby Bodenheimer, David Guth, Timothy P. McNamara, Gayathri Narasimham, John D. Bransford, Nancy Vye and Thomas H. Carr. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Developmental Psychology, Journal of Vision and ACM Transactions on Applied Perception.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact