John J. Osborne
- Co-authors
- Ethan A. LernerJ LoscalzoPaul D. GesellchenMarlene L. CohenRobert T. ShumanJeffrey A. DodgeCharles A. FrolikHenry U. Bryant
- Topics
- Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (3 papers)Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers)Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American College of CardiologyJournal of Medicinal ChemistryJournal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John J. Osborne
11 papers receiving 223 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Molecular Biology 104
- Genetics 50
- Physiology 40
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 39
- Pharmacology 30
Countries citing papers authored by John J. Osborne
This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Osborne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Osborne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Osborne. The network helps show where John J. Osborne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John J. Osborne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John J. Osborne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John J. Osborne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John J. Osborne. John J. Osborne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 52 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | Early diagnosis of cervical vertebral malformation in young Thoroughbred horses and successful treatment with restricted, paced diet and confinement | 9 |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | The thickness and hardness of soft tissues. A preliminary clinical survey. | 17 |
About John J. Osborne
John J. Osborne is a scholar working on Equine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 12 papers that have together received 232 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (3 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers) and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (7 citations), Orthodontics (10 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (39 citations). John J. Osborne has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ethan A. Lerner, J Loscalzo, Paul D. Gesellchen, Marlene L. Cohen, Robert T. Shuman, Jeffrey A. Dodge, Charles A. Frolik, Henry U. Bryant, Andrew L. Glasebrook and Charles W. Lugar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.