John J. Mitchell

22 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

John J. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Clinical Psychology 93
  • Neurology 49
  • Neurology 19
  • Physiology 57
  • Applied Psychology 11
Replace Katelin Hoskins with:
Katelin Hoskins United States
Ahmed Hankir United Kingdom
Alyssa T. Brooks United States
Mia Atoui Lebanon
Dee Snape United Kingdom
Rollon Poinsot France
Cheri Bethune Canada
Anne Orgler Sordi Brazil
Stuart G. Finder United States
G. Lyrakos Greece
John J. Mitchell relative to Katelin Hoskins United States Katelin Hoskins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Katelin Hoskins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Mitchell. The network helps show where John J. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John J. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together John J. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202177
2 198852
3 199946
4 202123
5 202317
6 200015
7 202215
8 202212
9
The Adolescent Predicament
197510
10
Adolescent Struggle for Selfhood and Identity
19929
11 20227
12 20226
13 20235
14
Moral dilemmas of early adolescence.
19755
15 19864
16 20232
17 20242
18 20242
19
Moral growth during adolescence.
19752
20 20251

About John J. Mitchell

John J. Mitchell is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Physiology, Social Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (93 citations), Neurology (49 citations), Neurology (19 citations), Physiology (57 citations) and Applied Psychology (11 citations). John J. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Steptoe, Daisy Fancourt, Jessica K. Bone, Raymond J. Dolan, A. Wakeling, Feifei Bu, Aleksandra Herbeć, Joanna M. Blodgett, Lion Shahab and Russell J.M. Lane. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Scientific Reports, European Stroke Journal and Frontiers in Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact