Edwin J. Perkins

41 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Edwin J. Perkins
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 78
  • Finance 80
  • Economics and Econometrics 202
  • Marketing 54
  • Accounting 66
Replace Lance Davis with:
Lance Davis United States
Robin Pearson United Kingdom
Jean‐Michel Servet Switzerland
A.J. Arnold United Kingdom
Joost Jonker Netherlands
Vincent P. Carosso United States
Raymond de Roover United States
William J. Barber United States
C. P. Chandrasekhar India
Jeffrey Fear United States
Edwin J. Perkins relative to Lance Davis United States Lance Davis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Lance Davis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin J. Perkins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin J. Perkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin J. Perkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin J. Perkins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin J. Perkins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin J. Perkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin J. Perkins. The network helps show where Edwin J. Perkins may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Edwin J. Perkins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin J. Perkins Line = papers co-authored together Edwin J. Perkins links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A History of Accounting in America: An Historical Interpretation of the Cultural Significance of Accounting
197970
2 199537
3 199529
4 198327
5 201125
6 197624
7 199624
8 200121
9 198717
10 197516
11 198815
12 197812
13 19767
14 19896
15 19776
16 19816
17 20045
18 19815
19 19785
20
Men and organizations : the American economy in the twentieth century
19774

About Edwin J. Perkins

Edwin J. Perkins is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Management Information Systems, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Anthropology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers), American History and Culture (2 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Economic, financial, and policy analysis (2 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (78 citations), Finance (80 citations), Economics and Econometrics (202 citations), Marketing (54 citations) and Accounting (66 citations). Edwin J. Perkins has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gary John Previts, Barbara D. Merino, John J. McCusker, Converse D. Clowse, Naomi R. Lamoreaux, Peter J. Coleman, Alan R. Raucher, Maury Klein, T. H. Breen and Donald R. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, Business History, The Journal of Economic History and The Business History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact