John Hood

598 citations
33 papers · 394 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John Hood

30 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

John Hood
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Public Administration 47
  • Strategy and Management 181
  • Finance 54
  • Accounting 58
  • Management Information Systems 39
Replace Margaret Greenwood with:
Margaret Greenwood United Kingdom
Jill Wells United Kingdom
James Edwin Kee United States
Mark L. Frigo United States
Jan Rose Skaksen Denmark
Michael Spackman United Kingdom
Juan Ventura Spain
Lewis Evans New Zealand
Cynthia Kroll United States
Nadeem Khan United Kingdom
John Hood relative to Margaret Greenwood United Kingdom Margaret Greenwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Margaret Greenwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Hood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Hood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Hood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Hood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Hood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Hood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Hood. The network helps show where John Hood may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Hood, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Hood Line = papers co-authored together John Hood links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200567
2 200656
3 201441
4 200240
5 200422
6 201118
7 201317
8 200516
9 200314
10 200711
11 200910
12 20039
13 20029
14 19999
15
Caveat Emptor: The Head Start Scam. Policy Analysis No. 187.
19928
16 20096
17 20035
18 20114
19 20064
20 20104

About John Hood

John Hood is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Accounting, Finance and Public Administration, having authored 33 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public-Private Partnership Projects (9 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (6 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (6 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (6 papers), Risk Management in Financial Firms (5 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (47 citations), Strategy and Management (181 citations), Finance (54 citations), Accounting (58 citations) and Management Information Systems (39 citations). John Hood has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Neil McGarvey, Ian Fraser, Darinka Asenova, Peter C. Young, Stephen J. Bailey, Tom Smith, Georgios Sermpinis, Andreas Karathanasopoulos, Christian L. Dunis and Claire McCann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Risk Research, Public Policy and Administration, Policy Studies, Public Money & Management and The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact