John H. Suh

451 total citations
9 papers, 326 citations indexed

About

John H. Suh is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, John H. Suh has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 326 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 5 papers in Genetics and 3 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in John H. Suh's work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (5 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (2 papers). John H. Suh is often cited by papers focused on Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (5 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (2 papers). John H. Suh collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Hungary. John H. Suh's co-authors include Gene H. Barnett, Ehsan H. Balagamwala, Samuel T. Chao, Howard S. Levin, Roger M. Macklis, Craig D. Zippe, Patrick Kupelian, Jerald Katcher, Eric Klein and Patrick A. Kupelian and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Urology, British Journal of Cancer and Neuro-Oncology.

In The Last Decade

John H. Suh

8 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

John H. Suh

PRM

GENET

EPIDE

SURGE

NEURO

R.O. Mirimanoff Switzerland

Jean-Philippe Wagner France

Goldie Kurtz United States

Allen G. Meek United States

Silke Birgit Nachbichler Germany

E. Barret France

James H. Brashears United States

Vimoj Nair Canada

Giulio Alberto Carta Italy

Mikio Mimura Japan

R.O. Mirimanoff Switzerland

John H. Suh

170 ×0.7

PRM

69 ×0.7

GENET

32 ×0.6

EPIDE

96 ×1.8

SURGE

25 ×0.6

NEURO

Citations per year, relative to John H. Suh John H. Suh (= 1×) peers R.O. Mirimanoff

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Suh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Suh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Suh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Suh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Suh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Suh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Suh. The network helps show where John H. Suh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Suh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Suh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Suh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Suh. John H. Suh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Reddy, C.A., Ron Davis, Erin S. Murphy, et al.. (2025). Development of a recursive partitioning analysis for prediction of radiation necrosis following single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for intact brain metastases. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 174(2). 503–510.

2.

Tom, Martin C., Frank P. DiFilippo, Timothy D. Smile, et al.. (2022). P15.11.A 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: results of a prospective pilot study. Neuro-Oncology. 24(Supplement_2). ii86–ii86. 1 indexed citations

3.

Balagamwala, Ehsan H., Samuel T. Chao, & John H. Suh. (2012). Principles of Radiobiology of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Clinical Applications in the Central Nervous System. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment. 11(1). 3–13. 41 indexed citations

4.

Scott, Jacob G., John H. Suh, Paul Elson, et al.. (2011). Aggressive treatment is appropriate for glioblastoma multiforme patients 70 years old or older: a retrospective review of 206 cases. Neuro-Oncology. 13(4). 428–436. 70 indexed citations

5.

Stea, Baldassarre, Edward Shaw, Tamás Pintér, et al.. (2006). Efaproxiral red blood cell concentration predicts efficacy in patients with brain metastases. British Journal of Cancer. 94(12). 1777–1784. 6 indexed citations

6.

Steinmetz, Michael P., et al.. (2001). Metastatic Seeding of the Stereotactic Biopsy Tract in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Journal of Neuro-Oncology. 55(3). 167–171. 30 indexed citations

7.

Kupelian, Patrick A., Eric A. Klein, John S. Witte, Varant Kupelian, & John H. Suh. (1997). FAMILIAL PROSTATE CANCER: A DIFFERENT DISEASE?. The Journal of Urology. 158(6). 2197–2201. 56 indexed citations

8.

Kupelian, Patrick, Jerald Katcher, Howard S. Levin, et al.. (1997). External beam radiotherapy versus radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2 prostate cancer: therapeutic implications of stratification by pretreatment PSA levels and biopsy Gleason scores.. PubMed. 3(2). 78–87. 90 indexed citations

9.

Ryu, Young Hoon, et al.. (1996). HMPAO SPECT to assess neurologic deficits during balloon test occlusion.. PubMed. 37(4). 551–4. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact