Countries citing papers authored by John H. Jackson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Jackson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Jackson. The network helps show where John H. Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John H. Jackson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John H. Jackson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John H. Jackson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John H. Jackson. John H. Jackson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jackson, John H., et al.. (2014). Look beyond the Label: Reframing, Reimagining, and Reinvesting in CTE.. The American Educator. 38(3). 34–39.5 indexed citations
2.
Jackson, John H., William J. Davey, & Alan O. Sykes. (2013). International economic relations : cases, materials and text on the national and international regulation of transnational economic relations.
3.
Jackson, John H.. (2009). Process and Procedure in WTO Dispute Settlement. Cornell international law journal. 42(2). 233–240.1 indexed citations
4.
Jackson, John H.. (2007). The jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO : insights on treaty law and economic relations. Cambridge University Press eBooks.24 indexed citations
5.
Jackson, John H.. (2004). The Varied Policies of International Juridical Bodies: Reflections on Theory and Practice. eYLS (Yale Law School). 25(4). 869–878.2 indexed citations
6.
Jackson, John H., et al.. (2002). Some Reflections of Compliance with WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions. SSRN Electronic Journal. 33(4). 555.2 indexed citations
Jackson, John H., et al.. (2000). New directions in international economic law : essays in honour of John H. Jackson. Kluwer Law International eBooks.15 indexed citations
9.
Jackson, John H.. (1999). Reflections on the MJIL Special Issue. Michigan Journal of International Law. 20(2). 183–191.1 indexed citations
10.
Jackson, John H.. (1996). Reflections on International Economic Law. University of Pennsylvania journal of international economic law. 17(1). 17.1 indexed citations
11.
Jackson, John H.. (1995). International Economic Law: Reflections on the "Boilerroom" of International Relations. American University international law review. 10(2). 1.2 indexed citations
12.
Jackson, John H.. (1992). Dolphins and Hormones: GATT and the Legal Environment for International Trade after the Uruguay Round. University of Arkansas at Little Rock law review. 13(3). 429.1 indexed citations
13.
Jackson, John H.. (1992). GATT and the Future of International Trade Institututions. Brooklyn journal of international law. 18(1). 11.2 indexed citations
14.
Jackson, John H., et al.. (1985). International trade policy : the lawyer's perspective.1 indexed citations
15.
Jackson, John H.. (1984). Perspectives on the Jurisprudence of International Trade. American Economic Review. 74(2). 277–281.3 indexed citations
16.
Jackson, John H.. (1979). Antidumping law, policy and implementation. University of Michigan Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.