Countries citing papers authored by Carol S. Steiker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Carol S. Steiker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carol S. Steiker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carol S. Steiker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carol S. Steiker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carol S. Steiker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carol S. Steiker. The network helps show where Carol S. Steiker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carol S. Steiker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carol S. Steiker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carol S. Steiker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Carol S. Steiker. Carol S. Steiker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Steiker, Carol S.. (2020). Keeping Hope Alive: Criminal Justice Reform During Cycles of Political Retrenchment. Florida law review. 71(6). 1363.
Steiker, Carol S., et al.. (2016). Courting Death. Harvard University Press eBooks.13 indexed citations
5.
Steiker, Carol S., et al.. (2014). Atkins v. Virginia: Lessons from Substance and Procedure in the Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment. The De Paul law review. 57(3). 721.1 indexed citations
6.
Steiker, Carol S.. (2013). Gideon at Fifty: A Problem of Political Will. The Yale Law Journal. 122(8). 25.2 indexed citations
7.
Steiker, Carol S.. (2013). LESSONS FROM TWO FAILURES: SENTENCING FOR COCAINE AND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY UNDER THE FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES IN THE UNITED STATES. Law and Contemporary Problems. 76(1). 27–52.8 indexed citations
8.
Steiker, Carol S., et al.. (2012). Entrenchment and/or Destabilization - Reflections on (Another) Two Decades of Constitutional Regulation of Capital Punishment. Minnesota journal of law & inequality. 30(2). 211.1 indexed citations
9.
Steiker, Carol S.. (2012). Capital Punishment and Contingency. Harvard Law Review.2 indexed citations
Steiker, Carol S.. (2011). Mass Incarceration: Causes, Consequences, and Exit Strategies. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).3 indexed citations
12.
Steiker, Carol S., et al.. (2010). Cost and Capital Punishment: A New Consideration Transforms an Old Debate.1 indexed citations
13.
Steiker, Carol S., et al.. (2008). Opening a Window or Building a Wall? The Effect of Eighth Amendment Death Penalty Law and Advocacy on Criminal Justice More Broadly. Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University). 11(1). 155.5 indexed citations
Kadish, Sanford H., Stephen J. Schulhofer, & Carol S. Steiker. (2007). Aspen Publishers Criminal law and its processes : cases and materials.4 indexed citations
16.
Steiker, Carol S.. (2005). NO, CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS NOT MORALLY REQUIRED: DETERRENCE, DEONTOLOGY, AND THE DEATH PENALTY. Stanford Law Review. 58(3). 751–789.13 indexed citations
17.
Steiker, Carol S., et al.. (2003). Abolition in Our Time. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).1 indexed citations
18.
Steiker, Carol S.. (1997). Punishment and Procedure: Punishment Theory and the Criminal-Civil Procedural Divide. SSRN Electronic Journal.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.