John G. Thomas

2.6k citations
47 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 24

John G. Thomas

46 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

John G. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Periodontics 544
  • Otorhinolaryngology 277
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 68
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 156
  • Rehabilitation 194
Replace Inmaculada Tomás with:
Inmaculada Tomás Spain
Ioannis Alexandros Charitos Italy
K. Reimer Germany
Timothy F. Meiller United States
Caio Cézar Randi Ferraz Brazil
Nils Skaug Norway
Lucrezia Bottalico Italy
John M. Moran United States
Clay Walker United States
J.J. de Soet Netherlands
John G. Thomas relative to Inmaculada Tomás Spain Inmaculada Tomás's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.9×
Inmaculada Tomás · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Thomas. The network helps show where John G. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John G. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John G. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together John G. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201811
2 201624
3 201619
4 201123
5 201159
6 201114
7 201131
8 201090
9 200943
10 200860
11 200713
12 200668
13 200424
14 2003175
15
Computerized antimicrobial decision support for hospitalized patients with a bloodstream infection.
20032
16 2000193
17 200067
18 200088
19 19964
20 197028

About John G. Thomas

John G. Thomas is a scholar working on Periodontics, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Rehabilitation and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Oral microbiology and periodontitis research (12 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (12 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (11 papers), Antimicrobial agents and applications (8 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (8 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (5 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (5 papers) and Oral Health Pathology and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Periodontics (544 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (277 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (68 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (156 citations) and Rehabilitation (194 citations). John G. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Hassan H. Ramadan, Steven L. Percival, Clay Walker, Mark Bradshaw, Paul Webster, Linda Corum, Richard J. Crout, David W. Williams, Christopher Powala and Alison Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as International Wound Journal, Journal of Periodontology, Otolaryngology, Wound Repair and Regeneration and The Laryngoscope.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026