John G. Russell
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Spectroscopy
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- David M. ForkeyGideon FraenkelDavid M. GrantAlan J. JonesRobert G. BryantH.T. HowatA G VallonDaryl Matthews
- Topics
- Japanese History and Culture (5 papers)Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers)Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
John G. Russell
27 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Organic Chemistry 184
- Sociology and Political Science 64
- Spectroscopy 53
- Inorganic Chemistry 47
- Materials Chemistry 43
Countries citing papers authored by John G. Russell
This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Russell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Russell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Russell. The network helps show where John G. Russell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John G. Russell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John G. Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John G. Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John G. Russell. John G. Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | Embracing the other: race, redemption, and the black other in the life and works of Philip K. Dick | 1 |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | Narratives of Denial--Racial Chauvinism and the Black Other in Japan | 13 |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | Pemphigus, Sjögren's syndrome and mucosal pigmentation. | 4 |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 45 |
About John G. Russell
John G. Russell is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Spectroscopy and Biophysics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers) and Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (184 citations), Cultural Studies (42 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (47 citations). John G. Russell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David M. Forkey, Gideon Fraenkel, David M. Grant, Alan J. Jones, Robert G. Bryant, H.T. Howat, A G Vallon, Daryl Matthews, Maurice M. Kreevoy and Londa L. Borer. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of the American Chemical Society and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.