John G. Bishop

46 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

Evaluating Approaches to the Conservation of Rare and End...19942026200420151994250500750

Peers

John G. Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Plant Science 1.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 915
  • Molecular Biology 657
  • Ecology 590
Replace Pauline Y. Ladiges with:
Pauline Y. Ladiges Australia
Irène Till‐Bottraud France
Antonio González‐Rodríguez Mexico
F. Thomas Ledig United States
Nigel P. Barker South Africa
Marcelo Fragomeni Simon Brazil
Stephen DiFazio United States
Allan E. Strand United States
Shoko Sakai Japan
Akiko Satake Japan
John G. Bishop relative to Pauline Y. Ladiges Australia Pauline Y. Ladiges's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pauline Y. Ladiges · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Bishop. The network helps show where John G. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John G. Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John G. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John G. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John G. Bishop. John G. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 7
2 28
3 10
4 23
5 37
6 15
7
Headlands around SRC plantations have potential to provide new habitats for plants and butterflies on farmland.
1
8 37
9 52
10 21
11 67
12 146
13 176
14 31
15 18
16 12
17 16
18 20
19
Soil crusting effects on potato plant emergence and growth
4
20
Soil potassium for potatoes: Depletion of soil potassium by cropping necessitates potash fertilization in certain areas of Kern and Tulare counties
1

About John G. Bishop

John G. Bishop is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (11 papers) and Botanical Research and Chemistry (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (915 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations) and Ecological Modeling (208 citations). John G. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Douglas W. Schemske, Thomas Mitchell‐Olds, Brian C. Husband, Ingrid M. Parker, Carol Goodwillie, Mary Ruckelshaus, William F. Fagan, Antony M. Dean, Eli A. Stahl and Мarcus A. Koch. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and Genes & Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026