Ingrid M. Parker

17.3k total citations · 5 hit papers
91 papers, 12.7k citations indexed

About

Ingrid M. Parker is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ingrid M. Parker has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 12.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Plant Science, 49 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 43 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Ingrid M. Parker's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (46 papers), Plant and animal studies (40 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (25 papers). Ingrid M. Parker is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (46 papers), Plant and animal studies (40 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (25 papers). Ingrid M. Parker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Panama and United Kingdom. Ingrid M. Parker's co-authors include Katrina M. Dlugosch, Gregory S. Gilbert, Daniel Simberloff, Peter Kareiva, Norman C. Ellstrand, David E. McCauley, Ann K. Sakai, Kimberly A. With, David M. Lodge and Robert J. Cabin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Ingrid M. Parker

91 papers receiving 11.9k citations

Hit Papers

The Population Biology of... 1994 2026 2004 2015 2001 1999 2007 1994 2006 1000 2.0k 3.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ingrid M. Parker United States 40 5.5k 4.9k 4.9k 4.5k 2.3k 91 12.7k
Sharon Y. Strauss United States 55 5.4k 1.0× 3.0k 0.6× 7.3k 1.5× 5.4k 1.2× 2.0k 0.9× 136 12.2k
John L. Maron United States 62 8.4k 1.5× 5.4k 1.1× 6.9k 1.4× 5.8k 1.3× 1.1k 0.5× 141 14.6k
Jason M. Tylianakis New Zealand 51 5.2k 0.9× 4.0k 0.8× 6.9k 1.4× 4.1k 0.9× 1.6k 0.7× 131 12.7k
Richard N. Mack United States 49 7.1k 1.3× 6.5k 1.3× 4.8k 1.0× 4.4k 1.0× 1.5k 0.6× 109 14.5k
Dave Kelly New Zealand 57 6.2k 1.1× 7.1k 1.4× 5.3k 1.1× 2.6k 0.6× 1.3k 0.6× 239 12.6k
Hans de Kroon Netherlands 65 7.7k 1.4× 4.6k 0.9× 6.1k 1.3× 6.9k 1.5× 1.3k 0.6× 171 16.5k
Tadashi Fukami United States 45 3.5k 0.6× 4.0k 0.8× 3.9k 0.8× 3.6k 0.8× 1.2k 0.5× 109 10.9k
Vojtĕch Jaros̆ı́k Czechia 52 7.4k 1.3× 4.9k 1.0× 5.5k 1.1× 4.9k 1.1× 889 0.4× 82 13.4k
Thomas O. Crist United States 47 6.2k 1.1× 5.2k 1.1× 5.1k 1.0× 1.7k 0.4× 1.7k 0.7× 110 11.8k
Mark van Kleunen Germany 64 8.8k 1.6× 4.1k 0.8× 8.1k 1.7× 7.1k 1.6× 1.9k 0.8× 301 16.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Ingrid M. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingrid M. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingrid M. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingrid M. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingrid M. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingrid M. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingrid M. Parker. The network helps show where Ingrid M. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingrid M. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingrid M. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingrid M. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingrid M. Parker. Ingrid M. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Parker, Ingrid M., et al.. (2025). Unfriendly neighbors: When facilitation does not contribute to restoration success in tidal marsh. Ecological Applications. 35(1). e3079–e3079. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lustenhouwer, Nicky, et al.. (2024). Invasion away from roadsides was not driven by adaptation to grassland habitats in Dittrichia graveolens (stinkwort). Biological Invasions. 26(9). 2923–2939. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lustenhouwer, Nicky, et al.. (2024). Plant–soil interactions during the native and exotic range expansion of an annual plant. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 37(6). 653–664. 5 indexed citations
4.
Brandt, Angela J., G. Kenny Png, Insu Jo, et al.. (2023). Managing multi‐species plant invasions when interactions influence their impact. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 21(8). 370–379. 11 indexed citations
6.
Vilà, Montserrat, et al.. (2022). Functional assembly of grassland plant species in native communities in Spain and recipient communities in California. Journal of Ecology. 111(1). 214–226. 5 indexed citations
7.
Lustenhouwer, Nicky & Ingrid M. Parker. (2022). Beyond tracking climate: Niche shifts during native range expansion and their implications for novel invasions. Journal of Biogeography. 49(8). 1481–1493. 15 indexed citations
9.
Moore‐O’Leary, Kara A., et al.. (2020). Simulated solar panels create altered microhabitats in desert landforms. Ecosphere. 11(4). 65 indexed citations
10.
Liang, Minxia, Xubing Liu, Ingrid M. Parker, et al.. (2019). Soil microbes drive phylogenetic diversity-productivity relationships in a subtropical forest. Science Advances. 5(10). eaax5088–eaax5088. 57 indexed citations
12.
Parker, Ingrid M., et al.. (2014). Domestication of the neotropical tree Chrysophyllum cainito from a geographically limited yet genetically diverse gene pool in Panama. Ecology and Evolution. 4(5). 539–553. 6 indexed citations
13.
Swope, Sarah M. & Ingrid M. Parker. (2012). Complex interactions among biocontrol agents, pollinators, and an invasive weed: a structural equation modeling approach. Ecological Applications. 22(8). 2122–2134. 14 indexed citations
14.
Swope, Sarah M. & Ingrid M. Parker. (2010). Widespread seed limitation affects plant density but not population trajectory in the invasive plant Centaurea solstitialis. Oecologia. 164(1). 117–128. 21 indexed citations
15.
Parker, Ingrid M. & Karen Haubensak. (2008). Forest Regeneration under Scotch Broom Control. Technical report submitted to Fort Lewis and The Nature Conservancy.. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 1 indexed citations
16.
Parker, Ingrid M. & Gregory S. Gilbert. (2007). WHEN THERE IS NO ESCAPE: THE EFFECTS OF NATURAL ENEMIES ON NATIVE, INVASIVE, AND NONINVASIVE PLANTS. Ecology. 88(5). 1210–1224. 125 indexed citations
17.
Dlugosch, Katrina M. & Ingrid M. Parker. (2007). Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Molecular Ecology. 17(1). 431–449. 1427 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Hayden, Katherine J. & Ingrid M. Parker. (2002). Plasticity in cyanogenesis of Trifolium repens L.: inducibility, fitness costs and variable expression. Evolutionary ecology research. 4(2). 155–168. 39 indexed citations
19.
Parker, Ingrid M.. (2000). Invasion Dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: A Matrix Model Approach. Ecological Applications. 10(3). 726–726. 9 indexed citations
20.
Kareiva, Peter, Ingrid M. Parker, & Miguel Pascual. (1996). Can We Use Experiments and Models in Predicting the Invasiveness of Genetically Engineered Organisms?. Ecology. 77(6). 1670–1675. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026