John Fritch
Impact in
-
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Communication top 5%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Intelligence, Security, War Strategy 1
- Co-authors
- Douglas S. Taylor (1 shared paper)James W. Chan (1 shared paper)Denise M. Krol (1 shared paper)Catherine Bresee (2 shared papers)Ken Catchpole (2 shared papers)M. Jonathon Solnik (2 shared papers)Jennifer T. Anger (2 shared papers)Catherine Helen Palczewski (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Online Information Review (1 paper)Reference Services Review (1 paper)Library trends (1 paper)Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (1 paper)Performance Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John Fritch
13 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Library and Information Sciences 39
- Communication 98
- Biophysics 46
- Information Systems 81
- Information Systems and Management 22
Countries citing papers authored by John Fritch
This map shows the geographic impact of John Fritch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Fritch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Fritch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Fritch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Fritch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Fritch. The network helps show where John Fritch may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Fritch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 119 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 51 | |
| 4 | The Emerging Reference Paradigm: A Vision of Reference Services in a Complex Information Environment | 2001 | 38 |
| 5 | 2002 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 10 | Rhetoric in Civic Life | 2016 | 4 |
| 11 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 14 | Forum: Argument Scholars Respond to Mercier and Sperber's Argumentative Theory of Human Reason: Introduction | 2012 | 0 |
| 15 | 2012 | 0 |
About John Fritch
John Fritch is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy, having authored 15 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Access Control and Trust (2 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (1 paper), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (1 paper), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (1 paper) and Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (39 citations), Communication (98 citations), Biophysics (46 citations), Information Systems (81 citations) and Information Systems and Management (22 citations). John Fritch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Douglas S. Taylor, James W. Chan, Denise M. Krol, Catherine Bresee, Ken Catchpole, M. Jonathon Solnik, Jennifer T. Anger, Catherine Helen Palczewski, Eric L. Short and Renaldo C. Blocker. Their work appears in journals such as Online Information Review, Reference Services Review, Library trends, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology and Performance Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.