John Forge

686 citations
42 papers · 275 indexed · h-index 9

John Forge

33 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

John Forge
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • History and Philosophy of Science 70
  • Health Informatics 7
  • General Psychology 4
  • Philosophy 27
  • Theoretical Computer Science 2
Replace Remco Heesen with:
Remco Heesen United Kingdom
Ana I. Moreno Spain
Roger Fellows United Kingdom
David Peterson United States
Robert Almeder United States
Niels Ole Finnemann Denmark
Marcel Chotkowski LaFollette United States
Gürol Irzık Türkiye
Boaz Miller Israel
Carlo Martini Finland
John Forge relative to Remco Heesen United Kingdom Remco Heesen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Remco Heesen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Forge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Forge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Forge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Forge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Forge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Forge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Forge. The network helps show where John Forge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Forge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Forge Line = papers co-authored together John Forge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20190
2 20170
3 20172
4 20170
5 20150
6 20125
7 200949
8 20088
9 200812
10 20048
11
The moral status of the (spare) embryo
20031
12 200216
13 20023
14 20004
15
Thinking about Nuclear Weapons - Beyond the Millenium
19991
16 19953
17
Measurement, realism, and objectivity : essays on measurement in the social and physical sciences
19875
18 19866
19 19853
20 197911

About John Forge

John Forge is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (6 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (5 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (4 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (70 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations), General Psychology (4 citations), Philosophy (27 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). John Forge has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Heather Douglas, Nicholas Evans, Bernard Gert, Ian Lowe, David Burch and S. Myhra. Their work appears in journals such as Metascience, Science and Engineering Ethics, Erkenntnis, Philosophy of Science and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026