John F. Neil
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Duane G. SpikerDavid J. KupferIsrael HaninPatricia A. CobleJonathan M. HimmelhochRichard F. UlrichDavid H. ShawJudy Weiss
- Topics
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers)Treatment of Major Depression (7 papers)Sleep and Wakefulness Research (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
John F. Neil
41 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Psychiatry and Mental health 554
- Pharmacology 317
- Cognitive Neuroscience 312
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 308
- Clinical Psychology 194
Countries citing papers authored by John F. Neil
This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Neil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Neil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Neil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Neil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Neil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Neil. The network helps show where John F. Neil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Neil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Neil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Neil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Neil. John F. Neil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | Neuropsychological assessment and EEG sleep in affective disorders. | 17 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 48 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | Amitriptyline plasma levels and clinical response in primary depression: II. | 14 |
| 18 | Psychotic pica, nicotinism, and complicated myocardial infarction. | 7 |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About John F. Neil
John F. Neil is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (8 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (7 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (554 citations), Biological Psychiatry (88 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (308 citations). John F. Neil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Duane G. Spiker, David J. Kupfer, Israel Hanin, Patricia A. Coble, Jonathan M. Himmelhoch, Richard F. Ulrich, David H. Shaw, Judy Weiss, J M Perel and P H Soloff. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Neurology and Chemical Engineering Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.