John F. Finamore
- Philosophy top 5%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 12
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 1
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies 7
- Archeology top 10%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 9
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 2
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 2
-
- Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods 1
- Co-authors
- Jonathan BarnesJulia AnnasHarold TarrantJohn DillonPaul WoodruffJohn M. DillonPlato PlatoDirk Baltzly
- Cited by
- PhilosophyAnthropologyArcheology
- Journals
- The Classical World (4 papers)Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) (1 paper)Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
John F. Finamore
11 papers receiving 50 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Philosophy 54
- Anthropology 41
- Archeology 31
- History and Philosophy of Science 5
- General Psychology 1
Countries citing papers authored by John F. Finamore
This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Finamore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Finamore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Finamore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Finamore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Finamore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Finamore. The network helps show where John F. Finamore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside John F. Finamore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 6 | Philosophy and Theurgy in Late Antiquity | 2010 | 4 |
| 7 | History of Platonism: Plato Redivivus | 2005 | 3 |
| 8 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 9 | Plotinus and iamblichus on magic and theurgy | 1999 | 5 |
| 10 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1989 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 8 |
About John F. Finamore
John F. Finamore is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology, Anthropology, Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 73 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (12 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (9 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (54 citations), Anthropology (41 citations), Archeology (31 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations) and General Psychology (1 citation). John F. Finamore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Barnes, Julia Annas, Harold Tarrant, John Dillon, Paul Woodruff, John M. Dillon, Plato Plato and Dirk Baltzly. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, Medical Entomology and Zoology and Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.