436 total citations 14 papers, 71 citations indexed
About
F.A.J. de Haas is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology and Anthropology.
According to data from OpenAlex, F.A.J. de Haas has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 71 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Philosophy, 7 papers in Archeology and 3 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in F.A.J. de Haas's work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (10 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers). F.A.J. de Haas is often cited by papers focused on Classical Philosophy and Thought (10 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers). F.A.J. de Haas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Netherlands. F.A.J. de Haas's co-authors include Jaap Mansfeld, Jacques Brunschwig, Martha C. Nussbaum, R. J. Hankinson, Glenn W. Most, Jonathan Barnes, Jill Kraye, John M. Cooper, Malcolm Schofield and Sarah Broadie and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Tijdschrift voor Philosophie and Phronesis.
Citations per year, relative to F.A.J. de Haas F.A.J. de Haas (= 1×)
peers
Tobias Reinhardt
Countries citing papers authored by F.A.J. de Haas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of F.A.J. de Haas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.A.J. de Haas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.A.J. de Haas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.A.J. de Haas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.A.J. de Haas. The network helps show where F.A.J. de Haas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F.A.J. de Haas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F.A.J. de Haas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F.A.J. de Haas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F.A.J. de Haas. F.A.J. de Haas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Haas, F.A.J. de, et al.. (2011). Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and the Byzantine Period. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
5.
Haas, F.A.J. de. (2009). Philoponus and the Mathematization of Logic. 20.1 indexed citations
6.
Haas, F.A.J. de & Jaap Mansfeld. (2004). Aristotle: On Generation and Corruption, Book I. Symposium Aristotelicum. Tijdschrift voor Philosophie. 68(2).4 indexed citations
Haas, F.A.J. de, et al.. (2000). Recensie van Aristoteles.Ethica Nicomachea.Vertaald, ingeleid, aantekeningen:Ch.Pannier & J.Verhaeghe. Groningen:Hist.Uitg,1999.Nicomachean Ethics Books VIII&IX. Translated:M.Pakaluk. Edited:J.L.Ackrill & L.Judson,Clarendon Aristotle Series,Oxford UP,1998. 26. 218–224.8 indexed citations
10.
Haas, F.A.J. de, et al.. (2000). Recollection and Potentiality in Philoponus. 165–184.2 indexed citations
11.
Haas, F.A.J. de, et al.. (1999). Review of Di Liscia, D.A., Kessler, E., and Methuen, C., eds. Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition. Aldershot-Brookfield: Ashgate, 1997.. 13. 349–352.6 indexed citations
Haas, F.A.J. de. (1997). John Philoponus' New Definition of Prime Matter: Aspects of Its Background in Neoplatonism and the Ancient Commentary Tradition. Medical Entomology and Zoology.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.