Sandra Daniels

1.0k total citations
27 papers, 768 citations indexed

About

Sandra Daniels is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Sandra Daniels has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 768 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Oncology, 9 papers in Surgery and 8 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Sandra Daniels's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (10 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (4 papers) and School Choice and Performance (4 papers). Sandra Daniels is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (10 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (4 papers) and School Choice and Performance (4 papers). Sandra Daniels collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Sandra Daniels's co-authors include John F. Bell, David Armstrong, Alan Barkun, William G. Paterson, Pierre Paré, A. B. R. Thomson, Bijan Chakraborty, S. J. O. Veldhuyzen van Zanten, Naoki Chiba and Sergio Escobedo and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and Gut.

In The Last Decade

Sandra Daniels

25 papers receiving 689 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sandra Daniels Canada 12 344 279 173 144 115 27 768
Colin Rees United Kingdom 14 132 0.4× 43 0.2× 246 1.4× 236 1.6× 41 0.4× 50 743
Emily J. Campbell United States 15 82 0.2× 16 0.1× 144 0.8× 86 0.6× 45 0.4× 33 442
Lauren D. Feld United States 15 46 0.1× 67 0.2× 57 0.3× 11 0.1× 21 0.2× 44 711
Joanne Wilkinson United States 10 55 0.2× 22 0.1× 123 0.7× 87 0.6× 14 0.1× 20 444
Paul Gaffney United States 11 39 0.1× 74 0.3× 42 0.2× 14 0.1× 9 0.1× 24 481
R. P. Zwierstra Netherlands 9 151 0.4× 6 0.0× 29 0.2× 50 0.3× 114 1.0× 24 632
Peter B. Anderson United States 15 221 0.6× 61 0.2× 709 4.1× 628 4.4× 7 0.1× 67 1.5k
Cindy Y. Chang United States 9 87 0.3× 15 0.1× 90 0.5× 36 0.3× 20 0.2× 18 420
Silja Kosola Finland 17 295 0.9× 7 0.0× 56 0.3× 108 0.8× 55 0.5× 64 780
Gillian Richardson United Kingdom 9 38 0.1× 7 0.0× 54 0.3× 55 0.4× 135 1.2× 15 426

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Daniels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Daniels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Daniels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Daniels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Daniels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Daniels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Daniels. The network helps show where Sandra Daniels may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Daniels

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Daniels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Daniels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Daniels. Sandra Daniels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
MacIntosh, Donald, et al.. (2013). The Endoscopy Global Rating Scale – Canada: Development And Implementation of a Quality Improvement Tool. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 27(2). 74–82. 30 indexed citations
2.
Sherman, Philip M., Kwadwo Bosompra, Paul Bélanger, et al.. (2013). Evaluation of Funding Gastroenterology Research in Canada Illustrates the Beneficial Role of Partnerships. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 27(12). 717–720. 3 indexed citations
3.
Render, Craig & Sandra Daniels. (2011). 2011 Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Educational Needs Assessment Report. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 25(5). 244–246.
4.
Armstrong, David, Roger Hollingworth, Donald MacIntosh, et al.. (2011). Point-of-Care, Peer-Comparator Colonoscopy Practice Audit: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Quality Program – Endoscopy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 25(1). 13–20. 16 indexed citations
5.
Rostom, Alaa & Sandra Daniels. (2007). 2007 Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Educational Needs Assessment Report. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 21(8). 519–521. 1 indexed citations
6.
Paterson, William G., William T. Depew, Pierre Paré, et al.. (2006). Canadian Consensus on Medically Acceptable Wait Times for Digestive Health Care. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 20(6). 411–423. 105 indexed citations
7.
Thomson, A. B. R., Alan Barkun, David Armstrong, et al.. (2003). The prevalence of clinically significant endoscopic findings in primary care patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia: the Canadian Adult Dyspepsia Empiric Treatment – Prompt Endoscopy (CADET–PE) study. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 17(12). 1481–1491. 210 indexed citations
9.
Thomson, A. B. R., David Armstrong, Alan Barkun, et al.. (2001). Is prempt endoscopy necessary in uninvestigated dyspeptics? Prevalence of upper Gastrointestinal abnormalities — The CADET-PE study. Gastroenterology. 120(5). A50–A51. 7 indexed citations
10.
Daniels, Sandra, et al.. (2000). Descriptive study of hypercholesteremia in a Vietnamese population of the Gulf coast.. PubMed. 7(3). 65–71. 2 indexed citations
11.
Tougas, Gervais, Ying Chen, Geoffrey Coates, et al.. (2000). Standardization of a simplified scintigraphic methodology for the assessment of gastric emptying in a multicenter setting. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 95(1). 78–86. 83 indexed citations
12.
Daniels, Sandra, et al.. (2000). Can Starting Summer-born Children Earlier at Infant School Improve their National Curriculum Results?. Oxford Review of Education. 26(2). 207–220. 21 indexed citations
13.
Daniels, Sandra, et al.. (2000). Gender, Behaviour and Achievement: A preliminary study of pupil perceptions and attitudes. Gender and Education. 12(1). 87–113. 37 indexed citations
14.
Jewell, D P, V Mani, M R B Keighley, et al.. (1996). A randomised trial comparing mesalazine and prednisolone foam enemas in patients with acute distal ulcerative colitis.. Gut. 38(2). 229–233. 49 indexed citations
15.
Daniels, Sandra, et al.. (1995). Trends in the early admission of children to school: appropriate or expedient?. Educational Research. 37(3). 239–249. 3 indexed citations
16.
Daniels, Sandra, et al.. (1992). As they like it: Pupil preferences, self‐estimates and performance scores on science tasks. Evaluation & Research in Education. 6(1). 1–12. 2 indexed citations
17.
Daniels, Sandra & Martin Braund. (1992). Uncovering hierarchies in science assessment tasks. International Journal of Science Education. 14(4). 463–474. 4 indexed citations
18.
Daniels, Sandra, et al.. (1990). Self‐assessment: Pleasant surprise or harsh reality?. Evaluation & Research in Education. 4(1). 1–10. 4 indexed citations
19.
Daniels, Sandra & J. P. Bell. (1989). Balanced Science for All: Provision for the Sciences in Secondary Schools 1986-89.. School science review. 71(255). 9–14. 6 indexed citations
20.
Daniels, Sandra, et al.. (1979). Portion Sizes, Preparation and Cooking Yields, and Plate Waste in School Meals. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 33(3). 170–178. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026