John E. Russell

438 total citations
11 papers, 48 citations indexed

About

John E. Russell is a scholar working on Conservation, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, John E. Russell has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 48 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Conservation, 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in John E. Russell's work include Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (1 paper). John E. Russell is often cited by papers focused on Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (2 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (1 paper). John E. Russell collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. John E. Russell's co-authors include Renn Tumlison, Merinda Kaye Hensley, David G. Stork, Catherine E. Adams, James Z. Wang, George S. Young, Jia Li, John Morkes and Jia Li and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Advances in Health Sciences Education and Acta Zoologica.

In The Last Decade

John E. Russell

10 papers receiving 44 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John E. Russell United States	4	9	9	9	9	6	11	48
Jessica Wolff United States	6		6 0.7×	2 0.2×	26 2.9×	9 1.5×	14	70
Chris German United States	6		5 0.6×	7 0.8×	15 1.7×	1 0.2×	11	115
Bernard Fosso Cameroon	3		10 1.1×	14 1.6×	3 0.3×		4	26
Maurice Bloomfield	4		5 0.6×	5 0.6×	1 0.1×	2 0.3×	12	41
Kátia Regina Pisciotta Brazil	2		3 0.3×	7 0.8×	4 0.4×		2	19
D. J. Thompson Canada	2		11 1.2×	9 1.0×	2 0.2×		2	22
Wouter van der Weijden	3		7 0.8×	9 1.0×	2 0.2×		3	21
Pieter Bol	2		7 0.8×	8 0.9×	2 0.2×		2	18
Lucy Jayne Ormsby United Kingdom	2		9 1.0×	11 1.2×	2 0.2×		2	18
Thomas Lindsay United States	4		2 0.2×	6 0.7×	2 0.2×	2 0.3×	10	47

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Russell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Russell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Russell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Russell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Russell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Russell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Russell. The network helps show where John E. Russell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. Russell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. Russell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. Russell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John E. Russell. John E. Russell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Li, Jia, et al.. (2023). A Machine Learning Paradigm for Studying Pictorial Realism: How Accurate are Constable's Clouds?. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 46(1). 33–42. 3 indexed citations

2.

Russell, John E., et al.. (2023). Comparison of Journal Usage in Rural Sociology Dissertations Using Text Analysis and CD Rank. Serials Review. 49(1-2). 1–9. 1 indexed citations

3.

Russell, John E., et al.. (2022). Examination of Journal Usage in Rural Sociology Dissertations Using Citation Analysis. Serials Review. 48(1-2). 112–120. 2 indexed citations

4.

Li, Jia, et al.. (2022). Reducing Bias in AI-based Analysis of Visual Artworks. 1–16. 6 indexed citations

5.

Li, Jia, et al.. (2022). Techniques of the Art Historical Observer. 21(1). 1 indexed citations

6.

Russell, John E.. (2020). Professional Learning to Support the Implementation of Instructional Materials: Case Studies From an Integrity Perspective.. ICLS. 2 indexed citations

7.

Russell, John E. & Merinda Kaye Hensley. (2017). Beyond buttonology: Digital humanities, digital pedagogy, and the ACRL Framework. College & Research Libraries News. 78(11). 588–588. 4 indexed citations

8.

Russell, John E., et al.. (2009). Integrated Case Learning: teaching clinical reasoning. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 15(2). 251–264. 11 indexed citations

9.

Morkes, John, et al.. (1997). BIOculars. 365–365. 1 indexed citations

10.

Russell, John E.. (1996). An approach to organisational ethnographic research: strategy, methods and processes. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations

11.

Russell, John E. & Renn Tumlison. (1996). Comparison of Microstructure of White Winter Fur and Brown Summer Fur of Some Arctic Mammals. Acta Zoologica. 77(4). 279–282. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact