John E. Proctor

1.9k total citations
52 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

John E. Proctor is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Geophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, John E. Proctor has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Materials Chemistry, 21 papers in Geophysics and 19 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in John E. Proctor's work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (21 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (9 papers) and Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (9 papers). John E. Proctor is often cited by papers focused on High-pressure geophysics and materials (21 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (9 papers) and Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (9 papers). John E. Proctor collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. John E. Proctor's co-authors include Eugene Gregoryanz, Daniel Errandonea, Matthew P. Halsall, Christophe L. Guillaume, Olga Degtyareva, Kostya S. Novoselov, Mustafa Lotya, Michael Hanfland, Jonathan N. Coleman and D. J. Dunstan and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, ACS Nano and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

John E. Proctor

49 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John E. Proctor
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Materials Chemistry 895
  • Geophysics 423
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 311
  • Biomedical Engineering 253
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 165
Replace Federico Zontone with:
Federico Zontone France
Dong‐Bo Zhang China
D. S. Phillips United States
René Messina Germany
Yuriy Chushkin France
Sergey Starikov Russia
Satoshi Tomita Japan
John P. Sutter United Kingdom
Akira Sawaoka Japan
Hisao Kobayashi Japan
Federico Zontone France View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John E. Proctor
John E. Proctor · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John E. Proctor
John E. Proctor · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Proctor. The network helps show where John E. Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John E. Proctor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John E. Proctor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John E. Proctor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John E. Proctor. John E. Proctor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 20
4 11
5 104
6 47
7 3
8 1
9 38
10 18
11 29
12 22
13 24
14 51
15 1
16 96
17 20
18 43
19 55
20 11

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026